Indiana Statutes
§ 31-16-6-1 — Child support orders; relevant factors; income withholding; account at financial institution
Indiana § 31-16-6-1
This text of Indiana § 31-16-6-1 (Child support orders; relevant factors; income withholding; account at financial institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ind. Code § 31-16-6-1 (2026).
Text
(a)Subject to subsection (f), in an action for
dissolution of marriage under IC 31-15-2, legal separation under IC 31-15-3, child support under IC 31-16-2, or establishment of paternity
under IC 31-14, the court may order either parent or both parents to pay
any amount reasonable for support of a child, without regard to marital
misconduct, after considering all relevant factors, including:
(1)the financial resources of the custodial parent;
(2)the standard of living the child would have enjoyed if:
(A)the marriage had not been dissolved;
(B)the separation had not been ordered; or
(C)in the case of a paternity action, the parents had been
married and remained married to each other;
(3)the physical or mental condition of the child and the child's
educational needs; and
(4)the financ
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carmichael v. Siegel
754 N.E.2d 619 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2001)
Marriage of Sutton v. Sutton
773 N.E.2d 289 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2002)
Carter v. Dayhuff
829 N.E.2d 560 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2005)
Claypool v. Claypool
712 N.E.2d 1104 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1999)
Richard Eric Johnson v. Gillian Wheeler Johnson
999 N.E.2d 56 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2013)
Mariga v. Flint
822 N.E.2d 620 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2005)
In Re Paternity of KJL
725 N.E.2d 155 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
In Re Paternity of EMP
722 N.E.2d 349 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Van Meter v. Zimmer
697 N.E.2d 1281 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1998)
In re the Paternity of C.B. and S.B. Gregory W. Brown v. Kara Davis
112 N.E.3d 746 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2018)
Brown v. Brown
823 N.E.2d 1224 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2005)
Alexander Nikolayev v. Natalia Nikolayev
985 N.E.2d 29 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2013)
Louis v. Kenseth
725 N.E.2d 155 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Beavers v. Eskew
722 N.E.2d 349 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Ashabranner v. Wilkins
968 N.E.2d 851 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2012)
Marriage of MacLafferty v. MacLafferty
811 N.E.2d 450 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
William Zausch v. Diana (Zausch) Schnakenburg (mem. dec.)
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2019)
In Re the Marriage of: Lisa C. Medley v. Frederick A. Medley
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2013)
Todd Firkins v. Sheryl Firkins
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2014)
David Ashabranner v. Sandy Wilkins, f/k/a Ashabranner
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2012)
Legislative History
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.8. Amended by P.L.86-2002,
SEC.9; P.L.207-2013, SEC.44; P.L.94-2018, SEC.2.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 31-10-1-1
Purpose of recodification act§ 31-10-1-2
Statutory construction§ 31-10-1-3
Effect on existing rights and liabilities§ 31-10-1-5
References to repealed or replaced statutes§ 31-10-1-7
References to rules§ 31-10-2-1
Policy and purpose§ 31-10-2-3
Rights of persons with a disability§ 31-11-0.1-1
"Repealed statutes"§ 31-11-1-1
Same sex marriages prohibitedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Indiana § 31-16-6-1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/in/31-16-6-1.