This text of Indiana § 14-8-3-5 (Recodification of prior natural resources law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
The recodification act of the 1995 regular
session of the general assembly shall be construed as a recodification
of prior natural resources law. If the literal meaning of the
recodification act of the 1995 regular session of the general assembly
would result in a substantive change in the prior natural resources law,
the difference shall be construed as a typographical, spelling, or other
clerical error that must be corrected by:
(1)inserting, deleting, or substituting words, punctuation, or other
matters of style in the recodification act of the 1995 regular
session of the general assembly; and
(2)using any other rule of statutory construction;
as necessary or appropriate to apply the recodification act of the 1995
regular session of the general assembly in a manner that does not resul
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The recodification act of the 1995 regular
session of the general assembly shall be construed as a recodification
of prior natural resources law. If the literal meaning of the
recodification act of the 1995 regular session of the general assembly
would result in a substantive change in the prior natural resources law,
the difference shall be construed as a typographical, spelling, or other
clerical error that must be corrected by:
(1) inserting, deleting, or substituting words, punctuation, or other
matters of style in the recodification act of the 1995 regular
session of the general assembly; and
(2) using any other rule of statutory construction;
as necessary or appropriate to apply the recodification act of the 1995
regular session of the general assembly in a manner that does not result
in a substantive change in the law. The principle of statutory
construction that a court must apply the literal meaning of an act if the
literal meaning of the act is unambiguous does not apply to the
recodification act of the 1995 regular session of the general assembly
to the extent that the recodification act of the 1995 regular session of
the general assembly is not substantively identical to the prior natural
resources law.
[1995 Recodification Citation: New.]