Idaho § 72-1330B WORKPLACE MISCONDUCT

Idaho Statutes

§ 72-1330B — WORKPLACE MISCONDUCT

Idaho § 72-1330B

Title 72WORKER’S COMPENSATION AND RELATED LAWS — INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

Ch. 13EMPLOYMENT SECURITY LAW

This text of Idaho § 72-1330B (WORKPLACE MISCONDUCT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Idaho Code § 72-1330B (2026).

Text

72-1330A [72-1330B]. WORKPLACE MISCONDUCT.

(1)"Workplace misconduct" means conduct in connection with employment that willfully disregards the employer’s interest, willfully violates the employer’s reasonable rules, or disregards a standard of behavior that the employer has a right to expect of its employees.

(2)A claimant’s conduct disregards a standard of behavior the employer has a right to expect of its employees when the conduct falls below the standard of behavior expected by the employer and the employer’s expectation was objectively reasonable. There is no requirement that the claimant’s conduct be willful, intentional, or deliberate. The claimant’s subjective state of mind is not a relevant factor in determining workplace misconduct pursuant to this subsection.

(3)An employer’s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72-1330A [72-1330B]. WORKPLACE MISCONDUCT. (1) "Workplace misconduct" means conduct in connection with employment that willfully disregards the employer’s interest, willfully violates the employer’s reasonable rules, or disregards a standard of behavior that the employer has a right to expect of its employees.
(2) A claimant’s conduct disregards a standard of behavior the employer has a right to expect of its employees when the conduct falls below the standard of behavior expected by the employer and the employer’s expectation was objectively reasonable. There is no requirement that the claimant’s conduct be willful, intentional, or deliberate. The claimant’s subjective state of mind is not a relevant factor in determining workplace misconduct pursuant to this subsection.
(3) An employer’s expectation shall be considered objectively reasonable when it is communicated to the employee or flows naturally from the employment relationship. An expectation that flows naturally need not be communicated to an employee to be considered objectively reasonable.
(4) Mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, inadvertencies, isolated instances of ordinary negligence, good faith errors in judgment or discretion, or failure to meet the performance expectations of the employer because of inability or incapacity shall not be considered misconduct connected with employment.
(5) Except as provided in section 72-1366 (5), Idaho Code, conduct involving personal, nonjob-related behavior occurring outside the workplace shall not be considered workplace misconduct in connection with employment.