Idaho § 39-8706 STAY PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS

Idaho Statutes

§ 39-8706 — STAY PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS

Idaho § 39-8706

Title 39HEALTH AND SAFETY

Ch. 87IDAHO COMMONSENSE CONSUMPTION ACT

This text of Idaho § 39-8706 (STAY PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Idaho Code § 39-8706 (2026).

Text

In any action exempted pursuant to section 39-8703, Idaho Code, all discovery and other proceedings shall be stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss unless the court finds upon the motion of any party that particularized discovery is necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to that party. During the pendency of any stay of discovery, unless otherwise ordered by the court, any party to the action with actual notice of the allegations contained in the complaint shall treat all documents, data compilations, including electronically recorded or stored data, and tangible objects that are in the custody or control of such party and that are relevant to the allegations, as if they were the subject of a continuing request for production of documents from an opposing

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In any action exempted pursuant to section 39-8703, Idaho Code, all discovery and other proceedings shall be stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss unless the court finds upon the motion of any party that particularized discovery is necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to that party. During the pendency of any stay of discovery, unless otherwise ordered by the court, any party to the action with actual notice of the allegations contained in the complaint shall treat all documents, data compilations, including electronically recorded or stored data, and tangible objects that are in the custody or control of such party and that are relevant to the allegations, as if they were the subject of a continuing request for production of documents from an opposing party.