Idaho § 28-9-626 ACTION IN WHICH DEFICIENCY OR SURPLUS IS IN ISSUE

Idaho Statutes

§ 28-9-626 — ACTION IN WHICH DEFICIENCY OR SURPLUS IS IN ISSUE

Idaho·Title 28 COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS·Part 6. DEFAULT·Ch. 9 SECURED TRANSACTIONS

In an action arising from a transaction in which the amount of a deficiency or surplus is in issue, the following rules apply:

(a)A secured party need not prove compliance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance unless the debtor or a secondary obligor places the secured party’s compliance in issue.

(b)If the secured party’s compliance is placed in issue, the secured party has the burden of establishing that the collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance was conducted in accordance with this part.

(c)Except as otherwise provided in section 28-9-628, if a secured party fails to prove that the collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance was conducted in accordance with the provisions of this part relating to collection

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action arising from a transaction in which the amount of a deficiency or surplus is in issue, the following rules apply:
(a) A secured party need not prove compliance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance unless the debtor or a secondary obligor places the secured party’s compliance in issue.
(b) If the secured party’s compliance is placed in issue, the secured party has the burden of establishing that the collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance was conducted in accordance with this part.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in section 28-9-628, if a secured party fails to prove that the collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance was conducted in accordance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance, the liability of a debtor or a secondary obligor for a deficiency is limited to an amount by which the sum of the secured obligation, expenses and attorney’s fees exceeds the greater of:
(1) The proceeds of the collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance; or
(2) The amount of proceeds that would have been realized had the noncomplying secured party proceeded in accordance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition or acceptance.
(d) For purposes of subsection (c)(2) of this section, the amount of proceeds that would have been realized is equal to the sum of the secured obligation, expenses and attorney’s fees unless the secured party proves that the amount is less than that sum.
(e) If a deficiency or surplus is calculated under section 28-9-615 (f), the debtor or obligor has the burden of establishing that the amount of proceeds of the disposition is significantly below the range of prices that a complying disposition to a person other than the secured party, a person related to the secured party, or a secondary obligor would have brought.

Idaho § 28-9-626 (ACTION IN WHICH DEFICIENCY OR SURPLUS IS IN ISSUE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.