Idaho Statutes
§ 28-2-720 — EFFECT OF “CANCELLATION” OR “RESCISSION” ON CLAIMS FOR ANTECEDENT BREACH
Effect of "cancellation" or "rescission" on claims for antecedent breach. Unless the contrary intention clearly appears, expressions of "cancellation" or "rescission" of the contract or the like shall not be construed as a renunciation or discharge of any claim in damages for an antecedent breach.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Idaho § 28-2-720 (EFFECT OF “CANCELLATION” OR “RESCISSION” ON CLAIMS FOR ANTECEDENT BREACH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palmer v. Idaho Peterbilt, Inc.
641 P.2d 346 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1982)
Legislative History
[28-2-720, added 1967, ch. 161, sec. 2-720, p. 351.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 28-1-101
SHORT TITLES§ 28-1-102
SCOPE OF CHAPTER§ 28-1-104
CONSTRUCTION AGAINST IMPLIED REPEAL§ 28-1-105
SEVERABILITY§ 28-1-106
USE OF SINGULAR AND PLURAL — GENDER§ 28-1-107
SECTION CAPTIONS§ 28-1-201
GENERAL DEFINITIONS§ 28-1-202
NOTICE — KNOWLEDGE§ 28-1-204
VALUE§ 28-1-205
REASONABLE TIME — SEASONABLENESS§ 28-1-206
PRESUMPTIONS