Idaho Statutes
§ 28-2-715 — BUYER’S INCIDENTAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
Idaho § 28-2-715
This text of Idaho § 28-2-715 (BUYER’S INCIDENTAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Idaho Code § 28-2-715 (2026).
Text
(1)Incidental damages resulting from the seller’s breach include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt, transportation and care and custody of goods rightfully rejected, any commercially reasonable charges, expenses or commissions in connection with effecting cover and any other reasonable expense incident to the delay or other breach.
(2)Consequential damages resulting from the seller’s breach include
(a)any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise; and
(b)injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clark v. International Harvester Co.
581 P.2d 784 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1978)
Borah v. McCandless
205 P.3d 1209 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
Southern Idaho Pipe & Steel Co. v. Cal-Cut Pipe & Supply, Inc.
567 P.2d 1246 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)
Paullus v. Liedkie
442 P.2d 733 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1968)
Duff v. Bonner Building Supply, Inc.
649 P.2d 391 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1982)
Cannon Builders, Inc. v. Rice
888 P.2d 790 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1995)
Keller v. Inland Metals All Weather Conditioning, Inc.
76 P.3d 977 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2003)
Nezperce Storage Co. v. Zenner
670 P.2d 871 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Palmer v. Idaho Peterbilt, Inc.
641 P.2d 346 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1982)
Consolidated Supply Company v. Babbitt
534 P.2d 466 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1975)
Shaw v. Dauphin Graphic Machines, Inc.
240 F. App'x 177 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Stb Systems, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Micron Technology, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
990 F.2d 1260 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Legislative History
[28-2-715, added 1967, ch. 161, sec. 2-715, p. 351.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 28-1-101
SHORT TITLES§ 28-1-102
SCOPE OF CHAPTER§ 28-1-104
CONSTRUCTION AGAINST IMPLIED REPEAL§ 28-1-105
SEVERABILITY§ 28-1-106
USE OF SINGULAR AND PLURAL — GENDER§ 28-1-107
SECTION CAPTIONS§ 28-1-201
GENERAL DEFINITIONS§ 28-1-202
NOTICE — KNOWLEDGE§ 28-1-204
VALUE§ 28-1-205
REASONABLE TIME — SEASONABLENESS§ 28-1-206
PRESUMPTIONSCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Idaho § 28-2-715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/id/28-2-715.