Delaware Statutes

§ 1225 — Inconsistent statements under oath; no need to prove one false; framing indictment; proof of irreconcilable inconsistency; conviction of lesser offense

Delaware·Title 11·Part Delaware Criminal Code·Ch. 5 SPECIFIC OFFENSES·Subch. Offenses Against Public Administration

When a person has made 2 statements under oath which are inconsistent to the degree that 1 of them is necessarily false, and the circumstances are such that each statement, if false, is perjurious, the inability of the prosecution to establish specifically which of the 2 statements is the false one does not preclude a prosecution for perjury. The prosecution may be conducted as follows:

(1)The indictment or information may set forth the 2 statements and, without designating either, charge that 1 of them is false and perjurious.
(2)The falsity of one or the other of the 2 statements may be established by proof of their irreconcilable inconsistency. Such proof is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of falsity.
(3)If perjury of different degrees would be established by the making

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delaware § 1225 (Inconsistent statements under oath; no need to prove one false; framing indictment; proof of irreconcilable inconsistency; conviction of lesser offense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Legislative History

11 Del. C. 1953, § 1225; 58 Del. Laws, c. 497, § 1

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗