District of Columbia § 31-3153 Judicial review; mandamus.

District of Columbia Statutes

§ 31-3153 — Judicial review; mandamus.

District of Columbia § 31-3153

Title 31Insurance and Securities.

Ch. 31BHealth Benefit Plans Withdrawal from Market.

This text of District of Columbia § 31-3153 (Judicial review; mandamus.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.C. Code § 31-3153 (2026).

Text

(a)Any carrier aggrieved by any act, determination, rule, regulation, or order or any other action of the Commissioner pursuant to this chapter, and which was the subject of a contested case, may appeal to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, in accordance with § 2-510 .

(b)The filing of an appeal pursuant to this section shall not stay the application of any rule, regulation, order, or other action of the Commissioner to the appealing party unless the court, after giving the appealing party notice and an opportunity to be heard, determines that failure to grant the stay would be detrimental to the interest of policyholders, shareholders, creditors, or the public.

(c)Any carrier aggrieved by any failure of the Commissioner to act or make a determination required by this chapter

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) Any carrier aggrieved by any act, determination, rule, regulation, or order or any other action of the Commissioner pursuant to this chapter, and which was the subject of a contested case, may appeal to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, in accordance with § 2-510 .

(b) The filing of an appeal pursuant to this section shall not stay the application of any rule, regulation, order, or other action of the Commissioner to the appealing party unless the court, after giving the appealing party notice and an opportunity to be heard, determines that failure to grant the stay would be detrimental to the interest of policyholders, shareholders, creditors, or the public.

(c) Any carrier aggrieved by any failure of the Commissioner to act or make a determination required by this chapter may petition the Superior Court of the District of Columbia for a writ in the nature of a mandamus or a peremptory mandamus directing the Commissioner to act or make the determination forthwith.