District of Columbia Statutes
§ 22-1805 — Persons advising, inciting, or conniving at criminal offense to be charged as principals.
District of Columbia § 22-1805
This text of District of Columbia § 22-1805 (Persons advising, inciting, or conniving at criminal offense to be charged as principals.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 22-1805 (2026).
Text
In prosecutions for any criminal offense all persons advising, inciting, or conniving at the offense, or aiding or abetting the principal offender, shall be charged as principals and not as accessories, the intent of this section being that as to all accessories before the fact the law heretofore applicable in cases of misdemeanor only shall apply to all crimes, whatever the punishment may be.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Moore
651 F.3d 30 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Perry v. United States
36 A.3d 799 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
Hammond v. United States
880 A.2d 1066 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
Michael D. Tann v. United States
127 A.3d 400 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
Little v. United States
989 A.2d 1096 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
Ebron v. United States
838 A.2d 1140 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Tyree v. United States
942 A.2d 629 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
Lyons v. United States
833 A.2d 481 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Mitchell v. United States
985 A.2d 1125 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
Price v. United States
813 A.2d 169 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Ingram v. Shipman-Meyer
241 F. Supp. 3d 124 (District of Columbia, 2017)
English v. United States
25 A.3d 46 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
Chamontae A. Walker & Corey D. Yates v. United States
167 A.3d 1191 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)
Fox v. United States
11 A.3d 1282 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
Hawthorne v. United States
829 A.2d 948 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Johnson v. United States
812 A.2d 234 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
United States v. Wilson
720 F. Supp. 2d 51 (District of Columbia, 2010)
Lopez v. United States
77 A.3d 412 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
Snowden v. United States
52 A.3d 858 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
ALAZAJUAN M. GRAY and CLIFTON SMITH v. UNITED STATES.
147 A.3d 791 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Legislative History
Mar. 3, 1901, 31 Stat. 1337, ch. 854, § 908
Nearby Sections
15
§ 22-1001
Definitions and penalties.§ 22-1002
Other cruelties to animals.§ 22-1002.01
Reporting requirements.§ 22-1005
Issuance of search warrants.§ 22-1006.01
Penalty for engaging in animal fighting.§ 22-1006.02
Possession of an implement of animal fighting.§ 22-1008
Relief of impounded animals.§ 22-1009
Keeping or using place for fighting or baiting of fowls or animals; arrest without warrant.§ 22-101
Definition and penalty.§ 22-1011
Neglect of sick or disabled animals.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 22-1805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/22-1805.