District of Columbia Statutes
§ 19-113 — Renunciation of devises and bequests; election; time limitations; renunciation or election by guardian or fiduciary; maximum rights; effect of no devise or bequest or if nothing passes under either; antenuptial or postnuptial agreements.
District of Columbia § 19-113
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 19Descent, Distribution, and Trusts. [Enacted title]
Ch. 1Rights of Surviving Spouse or Domestic Partner, and Children.
This text of District of Columbia § 19-113 (Renunciation of devises and bequests; election; time limitations; renunciation or election by guardian or fiduciary; maximum rights; effect of no devise or bequest or if nothing passes under either; antenuptial or postnuptial agreements.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 19-113 (2026).
Text
(a)Subject to section 19-114, a surviving spouse or surviving domestic partner is, by a devise or bequest specified in section 19-112, barred on any statutory rights or interest he has in the real and personal estate of the deceased spouse or deceased domestic partner unless, within 6 months after the will of the deceased spouse or deceased domestic partner is admitted to probate, he files in the Probate Court a written renunciation to the following effect: “I, A B, surviving spouse or surviving domestic partner of late of , deceased, renounce and quit all claim to any devise or bequest made to me by the last will of my spouse or domestic partner exhibited and proved according to law; and I elect to take in lieu thereof my legal share of the real and personal estate of my deceased spouse
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duggan v. Keto
554 A.2d 1126 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Coates v. Watts
622 A.2d 25 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Berryman v. Thorne
700 A.2d 181 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)
American Security and Trust Company v. Freda Utley
382 F.2d 451 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
Spencer v. Williams
569 A.2d 1194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Charles C. Windsor v. Marjorie Mansfield Leonard
475 F.2d 932 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
White v. Sargent
875 A.2d 658 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
Rockler v. Sevareid
691 A.2d 97 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)
Sarbacher v. McNamara
564 A.2d 701 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Dickson v. Mintz
634 A.2d 1243 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Fielding v. BT Alex Brown
116 F. Supp. 2d 59 (District of Columbia, 2000)
Valentine v. Elliott
819 A.2d 968 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Legislative History
Sept. 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 696, Pub. L. 89-183, § 1; Mar. 24, 1998, D.C. Law 12-81, § 12, 45 DCR 745; Apr. 27, 2001, D.C. Law 13-292, § 801(g), 48 DCR 2087; Apr. 4, 2006, D.C. Law 16-79, § 5(h), 53 DCR 1035; Mar. 2, 2007, D.C. Law 16-191, § 92(d), 53 DCR 6794
Nearby Sections
15
§ 19-101.01
Applicable law.§ 19-101.02
Homestead allowance.§ 19-101.03
Exempt property.§ 19-101.04
Family allowance.§ 19-101.06
Penalties.§ 19-102
Dower and curtesy abolished.§ 19-104
Absent or incompetent spouse.§ 19-107
Effect of acts of one spouse.§ 19-107a
Release of dower.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 19-113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/19-113.