Connecticut Statutes

§ 45a-650 — (Formerly Sec. 45-70d). Hearing on petition for involuntary representation. Evidence. Appointment of conservator. Limitation re powers and duties. Probate bond.

Connecticut § 45a-650
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 45aProbate Courts and Procedure
Ch. 802hProtected Persons and Their Property

This text of Connecticut § 45a-650 ((Formerly Sec. 45-70d). Hearing on petition for involuntary representation. Evidence. Appointment of conservator. Limitation re powers and duties. Probate bond.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-650 (2026).

Text

(a)At any hearing on a petition for involuntary representation, before the court receives any evidence regarding the condition of the respondent or of the respondent's affairs, the court shall require clear and convincing evidence that the court has jurisdiction, that the respondent has been given notice as required in section 45a-649, and that the respondent has been advised of the right to retain an attorney pursuant to section 45a-649a and is either represented by an attorney or has waived the right to be represented by an attorney. The respondent shall have the right to attend any hearing held under this section.
(b)The rules of evidence applicable to civil matters in the Superior Court shall apply to all hearings pursuant to this section. All testimony at a hearing held pursuant to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gross v. Rell
585 F.3d 72 (Second Circuit, 2009)
111 case citations
Collins v. West Hartford Police Dept.
380 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
7 case citations
Zajicek v. Glastonbury Probate, No. Cv-96-0561770-S (May 21, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5470 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Soucy v. Haines, No. Cv95-0124874s (Jun. 20, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 7565 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)

Legislative History

(P.A. 77-446, S. 4; P.A. 80-227, S. 8, 24; 80-476, S. 129; P.A. 84-271, S. 5; P.A. 97-90, S. 4; P.A. 98-219, S. 17; P.A. 01-209, S. 6, 7; P.A. 04-142, S. 3; P.A. 06-195, S. 76; P.A. 07-116, S. 16; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-2, S. 76; P.A. 14-103, S. 6, 13; 14-121, S. 1; P.A. 15-240, S. 49; P.A. 16-40, S. 9; 16-193, S. 21; P.A. 18-45, S. 20.) History: P.A. 80-227 substituted “probate bond” for “bond ... in such amount as it deems necessary to protect the estate of the respondent”, effective July 1, 1981; P.A. 80-476 divided section into Subsecs. and reworded provisions; P.A. 84-271 amended Subsec. (a) by authorizing the court to consider such other evidence as may be available and relevant including a summary of the physical and social functioning level or ability of the respondent and the availability of support services, and providing such evidence may include reports from certain agencies and professionals in the social work and public health field; Sec. 45-70d transferred to Sec. 45a-650 in 1991; P.A. 97-90 amended Subsec. (c) to permit court not to appoint conservator if it appears that person or affairs of person are being cared for properly without appointment of conservator and to make technical changes, and amended Subsec. (d) re considerations in making determination of whether to appoint conservator; P.A. 98-219 added Subsec. (g) re limitation of powers and duties of conservator of the person or conservator of the estate; P.A. 01-209 amended Subsec. (a) to add provisions re examination by independent physician, psychologist or psychiatrist in matter in which Commissioner of Social Services seeks appointment of conservator, effective July 1, 2001; P.A. 04-142 amended Subsec. (a) by adding provision re confidentiality of medical report filed with the court, added new Subsec. (b) re court order for disclosure of required medical information, redesignated existing Subsecs. (b) to (g) as new Subsecs. (c) to (h), respectively, and made technical changes; P.A. 06-195 substituted “health care representative” for “health care agent” in Subsec. (h); P.A. 07-116 inserted provisions in Subsec. (a) re requirements before court receives evidence and respondent's right to attend any hearing under section, inserted new Subsec. (b) re applicable rules of evidence, designated as new Subsec. (c) existing provisions re court's receipt of evidence re capacity of respondent, and amended same to substitute 45 days for 30 days re physician examination preceding hearing, substitute reference to respondent's condition and respondent's ability to care for self or manage affairs for reference to respondent's “disability and the extent of its incapacitating effect”, and delete provisions re matters where Commissioner of Social Services seeks appointment of conservator for an elderly person, redesignated existing Subsec. (b) as Subsec. (d) and inserted provisions therein re disclosure of medical information, redesignated existing Subsec. (c) as (e) and amended same to delete “within the state” re place of hearing, redesignated existing Subsec. (d) as Subsec. (f) and inserted provisions therein re court's findings, redesignated existing Subsec. (e) as Subsec. (g) and amended same to substitute enumerated factors for consideration of best interest of respondent and prior alternative arrangements, inserted Subsec. (h) designator and added provisions therein re respondent's ability to nominate conservator and court's appointment of conservator, deleted former Subsec. (f) re court's findings of facts to be furnished upon request, redesignated existing Subsec. (g) as Subsec. (i), deleted former Subsec. (h) re limitation on powers and duties of conservator, added new Subsecs. (j) to (m) re limitations on powers of conservators and retention of rights of conserved person, and made technical changes; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-2 made a technical change in Subsec. (h); P.A. 14-103 amended Subsec. (b) to make technical changes and amended Subsec. (h) to add references to successor conservator and add reference to Sec. 19a-575a; P.A. 14-121 amended Subsec. (c) to insert Subdiv. (1) to (3) designators and add provisions re introduction of psychological evidence for person with intellectual disability, amended Subsec. (d) to add provision re disclosure of psychological information submitted, and made technical changes; P.A. 15-240 amended Subsec. (f)(3) by adding “the provisions of sections 1-350g and 1-352, or” and by deleting “1-43,”, added new Subsec. (k) re authority of court in assigning duties of conservator, redesignated existing Subsecs. (k) to (m) as Subsecs. (l) to (n) and amended redesignated Subsec. (l) by adding provisions re agent under power of attorney retains rights and authority not expressly assigned to conservator, except as provided in Subsec. (k), effective July 1, 2016; P.A. 16-40 changed effective date of P.A. 15-240, S. 49, from July 1, 2016, to October 1, 2016, effective May 27, 2016; P.A. 16-193 made a technical change in Subsec. (n); P.A. 18-45 amended Subsecs. (a), (c)(2) and (e) by replacing references to application with references to petition. Cited. 230 C. 828; 233 C. 44. Under 2005 revision, Probate Court does not have statutory authority to issue injunctive orders to third parties to carry out its decisions on behalf of a conserved person; probate bond requirement for conservators evinces a legislative policy that conservators are not entitled to quasi-judicial immunity for acts that are not authorized or approved by the Probate Court. 304 C. 234. Statutory factors in Subsec. (h) wholly supplant any consideration of the “best interests” of a respondent in conservatorship proceedings; respondent's best interests are neither a factor nor an overarching guide in selecting a conservator. 320 C. 178. Cited. 37 CA 137; 42 CA 70. A conservator may bring a civil action for dissolution of marriage on behalf of a conserved person. 128 CA 259. Probate Court is required to hear evidence on the record concerning a person's suitability and qualifications to be appointed a neutral third party conservator; such requirement is consistent with legislature's goal to establish transparency and accountability in probate proceedings. 130 CA 243. Evidence in adjudication to appoint conservator need not be limited to the specific factual inquiries set forth in Subsec. (h). 151 CA 403; judgment affirmed, see 320 C. 178. Cited. 44 CS 53.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 45a-650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/45a-650.