Connecticut Statutes

§ 45a-434 — (Formerly Sec. 45-272a). Division of estate among joint devisees or legatees.

Connecticut § 45a-434
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 45aProbate Courts and Procedure
Ch. 802bDecedents' Estates

This text of Connecticut § 45a-434 ((Formerly Sec. 45-272a). Division of estate among joint devisees or legatees.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-434 (2026).

Text

(a)When a testator orders an estate to be divided among two or more devisees or legatees without appointing any person to divide it, or if he appoints persons to divide it who refuse or are unable to do so, or when in any will any estate or interest has been given to two or more persons jointly, and the same is susceptible of a division, the executor or other fiduciary charged with the administration of the estate shall make the division, provided the court before which such will was proved may, in its discretion, during the settlement of the estate of the testator, on its own motion or on the request of anyone interested, appoint three disinterested persons to make the division. Such division shall, when accepted by the court, be binding on all persons interested.
(b)If the devisees, le

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 6970; P.A. 77-417, S. 1; P.A. 80-476, S. 320; P.A. 81-472, S. 81, 159; P.A. 10-32, S. 134.) History: P.A. 77-417 added provisions re agreements on division of estates in cases where will has been contested; P.A. 80-476 divided section into Subsecs. and rephrased provisions; P.A. 81-472 made technical changes; Sec. 45-182 transferred to Sec. 45-272a in 1981; Sec. 45-272a transferred to Sec. 45a-434 in 1991; P.A. 10-32 made technical changes in Subsec. (c), effective May 10, 2010. Annotations to former section 45-182: Distribution cannot be made by distributors appointed by heirs and devisees. 3 D. 260. Preceding case distinguished. 17 C. 354. Distribution can be made of a piece of land the north half of which was devised to one and the south half to another. 7 C. 21. Court of Probate has no jurisdiction to approve distribution made by parties appointed by will. 8 C. 412. No distributors necessary where estate is all in money. 16 C. 317. Distribution cannot be set aside in equity. 24 C. 246. Distributions to be liberally construed. 31 C. 588. Distributors should make a reappraisal if necessary, before distribution. 42 C. 346. Superior Court has no power to make or order distribution to be made. 46 C. 179. Court and distributors must recognize conditions and burdens attached to division by testator. 64 C. 53. Distribution as relating back to death of testator. 65 C. 510. Proceeds of sale of real estate treated as land would have been. 66 C. 410; 82 C. 308. Distributors' duties; cannot pass on validity of claims. 68 C. 84. Cited. 69 C. 78. Power of court to determine distributees. 71 C. 128; 72 C. 322. Treatment of fire insurance money where fire occurs after testator's death. Id., 29. Court may order partial distribution. 73 C. 56. When a person appointed in will makes only partial distribution, court may appoint distributors to complete it. 74 C. 131. No occasion for distribution if only one devisee. 77 C. 378. Distribution not source of title. 78 C. 485; 87 C. 85. Distribution to “heirs” of deceased person void. 78 C. 485; 80 C. 363; 83 C. 346; 84 C. 323. Distribution of stock in fractional parts. 81 C. 95. Any division joined in by all distributees constitutes valid distribution. 86 C. 471; 89 C. 427; 104 C. 103. Division may be executed by majority of the disinterested persons, provided all three had notice of meeting and opportunity to be present. 111 C. 591. Statute does not apply if testator appoints someone to make the division. 117 C. 374. Cited. 121 C. 112. Annotation to former section 45-272a: Cited. 2 CA 729. Annotation to current section: Defendant, who was neither a named beneficiary to the will admitted to probate nor recognized under intestacy statutes as an heir-at-law and who failed to establish that she had any pecuniary interest in the estate, was not a person interested in the estate under Subsec. (c) and, therefore, she was not a necessary party to the settlement agreement. 223 CA 676.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 45a-434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/45a-434.