Connecticut Statutes
§ 45a-186 — (Formerly Sec. 45-288). Appeals from probate. Venue. Service of process. Referral to special assignment probate judge.
Connecticut § 45a-186
This text of Connecticut § 45a-186 ((Formerly Sec. 45-288). Appeals from probate. Venue. Service of process. Referral to special assignment probate judge.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-186 (2026).
Text
(a)As used in this section and section 45a-187, “electronic service” has the same meaning as provided in section 45a-136f.
(b)Any person aggrieved by an order, denial or decree of a Probate Court may appeal therefrom to the Superior Court. An appeal from a matter heard under any provision of section 45a-593 , 45a-594 , 45a-595 or 45a-597 , sections 45a-644 to 45a-677 , inclusive, sections 45a-690 to 45a-703 , inclusive, or section 45a-705a , shall be filed not later than forty-five days after the date on which the Probate Court sent the order, denial or decree. Except as provided in sections 45a-187 and 45a-188 , an appeal from an order, denial or decree in any other matter shall be filed on or before the thirtieth day after the date on which the Probate Court sent the order, denial or d
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shakir v. Derby Police Dep't
284 F. Supp. 3d 165 (D. Connecticut, 2018)
Morrocco v. Toretto, No. 534769 (Jun. 24, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4789 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Cutler v. Estate of Agostinelli, No. Cv 97-0398566s (Jul. 9, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 9021 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
In Re Jeffrey S., (Jan. 12, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 1209 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Silverstein v. Estate of Silverstein, No. Cv 95 57529 S (Jan. 8, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 1159 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
In the Matter of Solnik, No. Cv92-0242031s (Oct. 27, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10962 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Evans v. Estate of Julia M. Simaitis, No. Cv 99-0586361-S (May 6, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6151 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
State v. Gordon, No. Cv95-0551656s (May 13, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4383 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Gaynor v. Payne, No. Cv98 00624805 (Nov. 13, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13701 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
State v. Lindsay, No. Cv 95-0552547-S (Feb. 26, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 1704 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Cammorota v. Appeal From Probate, No. Cv 02 0388486s (Mar. 6, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 2852 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Erickson v. Estate of Erickson, No. Cv 960387780s (Jun. 18, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6249 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Paiva v. Probate Court, No. Fa98-0144267s (Apr. 14, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3927 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
In Interest of Joseph M., (Jul. 2, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 9133 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
In the Interests of Alissa N., (Jun. 16, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7047 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 7071; P.A. 75-190, S. 1, 2; P.A. 76-221; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 127; P.A. 80-476, S. 92; P.A. 82-472, S. 174, 183; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; 93-225, S. 3, 4; P.A. 95-220, S. 4–6; 95-254, S. 1, 5; P.A. 97-165, S. 9, 16; P.A. 07-116, S. 2; P.A. 09-114, S. 14; Sept. Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-1, S. 3; P.A. 11-128, S. 11; P.A. 13-81, S. 4; P.A. 16-49, S. 17; P.A. 19-47, S. 10; P.A. 21-40, S. 42, 43; 21-100, S. 9; P.A. 22-112, S. 2.) History: P.A. 75-190 added exception re appeals by state; P.A. 76-221 required giving of security for costs, recognizance with surety or bond, replacing less specific requirement for giving of “bond, with sufficient surety to the state, to prosecute such appeal to effect”; P.A. 78-280 replaced “county” with “judicial district”; P.A. 80-476 reworded provisions but made no substantive change; P.A. 82-472 made technical change; Sec. 45-288 transferred to Sec. 45a-186 in 1991; P.A. 93-225 provided exception that appeal under Sec. 12-359(b) or Sec. 12-367(b) shall be filed in judicial district of Hartford-New Britain, effective July 1, 1993 (Revisor's note: P.A. 88-230, P.A. 90-98 and P.A. 93-142 authorized substitution of “judicial district of Hartford” for “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” in public acts of the 1993 session of the general assembly, effective September 1, 1996); P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 95-254 amended Subsec. (a) by replacing language re appeal with reference to Subsec. (b) and added Subsec. (b) re appeals, including appeals re matters concerning removal of parent as guardian, termination of parental rights and adoption to be filed in superior court for juvenile matters; P.A. 97-165 amended Subsec. (b) to add reference to Sec. 12-395(b), effective July 1, 1997; P.A. 07-116 amended Subsec. (a) to replace “in accordance with subsection (b) of this section” with “not later than” 45 days re matters heard under enumerated sections, or 30 days re other matters, add provisions re commencement of appeal and complaint, and add references to Secs. 17a-498, 17a-685 and 45a-650, replaced former Subsec. (b) re filing of appeal with new Subsec. (b) re service of a copy of complaint by person who files the appeal, added Subsec. (c) re filing document with clerk of the Superior Court re service made, added Subsec. (d) re authority of Superior Court to make order of notice if service has not been made, added Subsec. (e) re hearing to commence, unless stay has been issued, not later than 90 days after appeal is filed, added Subsec. (f) re filing of appeal not, of itself, staying enforcement of order, denial or decree appealed from, and added Subsec. (g) re ability of person aggrieved to seek available remedy including habeas corpus or termination of involuntary representation; P.A. 09-114 amended Subsec. (b) to provide that copy of complaint be mailed to, rather than served on, the court appealed from and to make conforming changes, and added Subsec. (h) re referral to special assignment probate judge, effective January 5, 2011; Sept. Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-1 amended Subsec. (a) to add provision re venue for appeals when court of probate is in a probate district that is in more than one judicial district and, in Subdiv. (2), to provide that appeals may be filed in any superior court having jurisdiction over matters arising in any town within probate district, effective January 5, 2011; P.A. 11-128 amended Subsec. (a) to add “Except as provided in sections 45a-187 and 45a-188”; P.A. 13-81 amended Subsec. (a) to add references to Secs. 17a-543, 17a-543a and 45a-644 to 45a-667v and delete reference to Sec. 45a-650, amended Subsec. (b) to delete requirement that person who files appeal mail copy of complaint to court that rendered order, denial or decree, added new Subsec. (c) re person who files appeal to mail copy of complaint to court that rendered the order, denial or decree and re court and judge not to be made or named as parties to the appeal, redesignated existing Subsecs. (c) to (h) as Subsecs. (d) to (i), amended redesignated Subsec. (d)(2) to require statement of the date and manner in which copy of complaint was mailed to court that rendered order, denial or decree, substituted “Probate Court” for “court of probate” and made technical changes; P.A. 16-49 amended Subsec. (i)(3) to delete reference to Sec. 45a-684; P.A. 19-47 deleted former Subsec. (a) re appeals from order, denial or decree of Probate Court, added new Subsec. (a) defining “electronic service”, added new Subsecs. (b) to (d) re appeals from order, denial or decree of Probate Court, redesignated existing Subsecs. (b) to (i) as Subsecs. (e) to ( l ) and made a conforming change in redesignated Subsec. (f), effective June 26, 2019; P.A. 21-40 amended Subsec. (b) by substituting reference to Sec. 45a-703 for reference to Sec. 45a-705 and amended Subsec. (l)(3) by substituting reference to Sec. 45a-669 for reference to Sec. 45a-668; P.A. 21-100 amended Subsecs. (d), (i) and (l)(3) to add references to Sec. 19a-131b, effective July 1, 2021; P.A. 22-112 amended Subsec. (b) by making a technical change and adding reference to Sec. 45a-705a, amended Subsecs. (c) and (i) by making technical changes and adding references to Sec. 45a-98e and amended Subsec. (l)(3) by adding Subpara. designators and adding reference to Sec. 45a-98e. Annotations to former section 45-288: Appeal is confined to decree appealed from. 2 R. 159. It must appear from appeal that appellant is aggrieved or affected by decree. 2 R. 220; 4 D. 141; 34 C. 203; 46 C. 528; 52 C. 217; 55 C. 229; 70 C. 456; 107 C. 356. One appeal may be taken from several decrees. 6 C. 359, but see 79 C. 87. Appeal not affected by fact that all the other heirs are satisfied. 7 C. 226. Appeal lies from decree allowing credit in administration account for payment of claim against estate. 8 C. 90. Also, account omitting debts collected. 21 C. 244. Appellate court may admit same testimony as Probate Court could do. 9 C. 231; 74 C. 257. Every act of Court of Probate is subject of appeal. 10 C. 192; 97 C. 442. Later decree, if reversed, reverses prior inconsistent decree. 13 C. 224. Appellate court has jurisdiction only over decree appealed from. 15 C. 523; 89 C. 432. Objection that appellant has no interest must be preliminary. 22 C. 131. Appeal cannot be taken to adjourned term of court. 19 C. 1. Nor to regular term subsequent to its commencement. 24 C. 145. When appeal affects other than the executor, parties in interest shall defray expenses. 19 C. 416. Taxing costs on appeal is discretionary with court. Id., 534; 22 C. 271; 38 C. 308; 76 C. 654. When costs are to be paid by administrator. 19 C. 538. Whether decree may be affirmed in part only, quaere. 23 C. 522. Appeal does not vacate or suspend decree appealed from. 28 C. 442; 34 C. 112; Id., 362; 75 C. 312. Appellant may withdraw appeal on settlement with appellee notwithstanding objection of other interested parties who previously agreed with appellant that appeal should be taken in his name, they sharing in expense. 32 C. 334. Appellate court not confined to reasons for decree appearing from record of Probate Court. 39 C. 401. Appeal from decree appointing guardian within jurisdiction of appellate court. Id., 538. Technical rules of pleading do not apply. 34 C. 446; 48 C. 205; 80 C. 401. A decree once affirmed on appeal may be again appealed from by another party. 47 C. 259. An appeal cannot be taken from allowance or refusal to allow appeal. 49 C. 70; 76 C. 426. Appellate court cannot exercise equity powers that Probate Court cannot exercise. 53 C. 24. Refusal by Probate Court to appoint trustee proper subject of appeal. 54 C. 324. Legatee under prior will may appeal from decree probating later will. 57 C. 545. Attaching creditor cannot appeal from decree adjudicating debtor an insolvent. 59 C. 37. Distributees may appeal from decree accepting return of distribution not in accordance with terms of will. 64 C. 53. “Aggrieved” applies only to persons having a pecuniary interest in matter in controversy. Id., 533; 70 C. 457; 106 C. 587. Is civil process; return day. 76 C. 284; 83 C. 677; 84 C. 659. Trial is de novo; power of court. 76 C. 121; 97 C. 443. Appeal by infant through next friend; husband who has renounced interest in wife's estate cannot be “aggrieved”, but sole heir may be, by order approving compromise of claim. 76 C. 426. Undue influence not in issue unless assigned in reasons of appeal. 74 C. 258. Though will is probated, appeal lies from distribution, on ground of invalidity of bequest. 79 C. 506. Appeal from allowance of account does not raise issue as to need of new inventory. 80 C. 623. Proper party to appeal from orders as to sale of ward's estate, after ward's death. 81 C. 127. Appeal from distribution cannot raise question of validity of appointment of administrator on estate of distributee. 83 C. 235. Burden of proof on appeal from allowance of account. 84 C. 659. Appeal lies from acceptance of distribution. 89 C. 421. Superior Court has no greater power than Probate Court; 64 C. 360; 71 C. 132; 81 C. 161; 84 C. 560; can appoint administrator; 76 C. 121; Id., 379; settle account; 72 C. 555; 80 C. 401; determine domicile of deceased. 86 C. 351. Superior Court cannot determine disputed question of title; 84 C. 560; see where trust provision is claimed to be invalid; 74 C. 601; 77 C. 705; power to construe will; 71 C. 122; court cannot pass on claims; 68 C. 84; power to determine allowance to widow. 69 C. 699. Not an “action” in such sense as to permit a jury trial. 90 C. 48. Written motion for appeal not necessary; mandamus lies to compel correction in appeal before service. 91 C. 110. Administrator cannot appeal from order appointing him; 88 C. 423; nor trustee in insolvency, from order refusing extension of time to present claims. 70 C. 455. No appeal lies from determination of distributees apart from order of distribution; 72 C. 322; but see where distributees fail to observe conditions imposed on estate. 64 C. 41; 71 C. 129. Appeal lies where Probate Court acted without jurisdiction. 71 C. 708. Appeals as to allowance of secured claims. 68 C. 184; 71 C. 708. Issues on appeal alleging testamentary capacity. 92 C. 173. Effect of clause in will providing for forfeiture if any beneficiary attacks will. Id., 173. Appeal should be from precise order or act involved. 105 C. 609. Members of unascertainable, fluctuating group of beneficiaries of a public charity lack direct pecuniary interest necessary for appeal. 106 C. 587. Administrator removed upon admission of will is not entitled to appeal. 117 C. 201. Nor is trustee removed for neglect of duty. 129 C. 67. The word “aggrieved”, as used in statute, construed. 122 C. 331. Provision of will that order of Probate Court shall be conclusive and no appeal allowed, held invalid. 131 C. 471. Cited. 139 C. 740; 140 C. 686. When acting upon an appeal from probate, Superior Court is exercising special and limited powers. 139 C. 374. An aggrieved person must have not only a pecuniary interest but a pecuniary interest which has been injuriously affected by the decree appealed from. Id., 652; 143 C. 433. If an appellant is not actually aggrieved, appeal is void. Id., 733. Trustee under a will has duty to protect the interests of the beneficiaries of the trust and if such interests are adversely affected by a later will, he is an aggrieved person to appeal from decree allowing later will. 140 C. 80. An aggrieved person is one who can show a direct pecuniary interest in the matter in controversy which interest the decree appealed from will in some way injuriously affect. 142 C. 379. One against whom a claim may be prosecuted is not an aggrieved person. 143 C. 720. Limits of Superior Court's jurisdiction in appeals from probate. 147 C. 656. Superior Court on appeal from probate sits as, and has no greater power than, a Court of Probate. 148 C. 642; 153 C. 603, 614. Superior Court acts as a Court of Probate, exercising a special and limited statutory jurisdiction rather than its constitutional jurisdiction; it cannot by exercise of general equity powers relieve plaintiff from effect of late filing of appeal under Sec. 45-289. 150 C. 563. Allegations that plaintiff is nephew, former ward and prospective heir of and “responsible for” alleged incompetent's care held insufficient to establish aggrievement within meaning of statute; there is no allegation his rights were adversely affected by appointment of conservator of property of incompetent. 154 C. 247. Appeal erased for want of jurisdiction where plaintiff had not shown himself to be an aggrieved person; mere allegation that plaintiff is aggrieved without supporting factual allegations is not sufficient and allegation that he is only child of incompetent does not bestow on him a real interest in proceedings. 156 C. 625. Review of Probate Court may not include evidence of matters not in existence at date of Probate Court hearing. 157 C. 576. In appeal from probate, Superior Court retries issues de novo and case is not presented on transcript of proceedings in Probate Court. 158 C. 217. Cited. Id., 293. To have standing as aggrieved party, plaintiff must have pecuniary interest which is injuriously affected by decree appealed from. 160 C. 463, 467. Cited. 165 C. 207; Id., 478, 482. Administrator of an intestate estate appointed by Probate Court and supplanted after discovery and probate of decedent's will by an administrator c.t.a. is not an “aggrieved person”. 167 C. 396. Unless plaintiffs are persons actually aggrieved by the order or decree, Superior Court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the appeal; to qualify as an aggrieved person, plaintiff must have a pecuniary interest in the subject matter of the decree or order, and that interest must be adversely affected by the decree or order from which the appeal is taken. 169 C. 218. Discussion of aggrievement. Id., 218, 220. Cited. Id., 382, 386; 174 C. 482. Plaintiff who bid upon property of an estate offered for sale has an interest in the proceedings used by the court to approve the sale sufficient to make him an aggrieved party and confer standing. 180 C. 511. Cited. 182 C. 322; 185 C. 25; 186 C. 63; Id., 360; 194 C. 635; 195 C. 123; 208 C. 606; 211 C. 323; 216 C. 514. A judgment creditor of an heir at law does not have standing to appeal as an aggrieved party where will disinheriting heir is admitted to probate. 1 CA 17. Cited. 2 CA 251; Id., 697; 3 CA 566; 4 CA 436; 6 CA 118; Id., 521; Id., 530; 9 CA 368; Id., 413; 11 CA 297; 13 CA 45; 19 CA 456; 20 CA 58; 22 CA 490. In this section and in Sec. 45-293 appear the requisites of an appeal from probate. 4 CS 208. Cited. 5 CS 169; 10 CS 503. Appeal not limited to parties but open to any person aggrieved. 13 CS 193. Failure to furnish bond renders the appeal voidable not void and the defect can be waived. Id., 440. Cited. 14 CS 432. Appeal from probate is an absolute right of one aggrieved of which he cannot be deprived by an omission of the court. 18 CS 48. Aggrieved person. One claiming to be a legatee under a later will who was not named in a will admitted to probate by court decree. 8 CS 260. Applies only to person having a pecuniary interest. Id., 320; 10 CS 98; 12 CS 47; 13 CS 97; Id., 193. Beneficiary under an earlier will is. 14 CS 369. Analogous to Sec. 31-249. 15 CS 62. Plaintiff's liability for support of her mother constituted her as one on an application for a finding of restoration of capacity for mother. Id., 177. Position of executor. 16 CS 460; 18 CS 98. One with a claim which could not be enforced against the administrator in his representative capacity is not. 20 CS 182. On an appeal from probate, Superior Court has no greater power than a Court of Probate. 21 CS 160. Neither the absolute right of appeal of an aggrieved party nor the jurisdiction of Superior Court upon such an appeal may be defeated by the neglect or omission of Probate Court; generally speaking, the technical rules of pleading do not apply to the formation and determination of issues in appeals from probate to Superior Court. Id., 352. In appeal re trustees' and attorney's fees, Superior Court can only find whether fees were reasonable or not; if parties stipulate that Superior Court can fix reasonable fees, court can do so. 24 CS 470. Where probate decree ordered coexecutors to restore part of sums paid one coexecutor and its attorneys, other coexecutor was aggrieved within meaning of section since decree created a joint and several liability against him. 27 CS 110. Plaintiffs' allegation in their motion for appeal that they are heirs at law of decedent and aggrieved by Probate Court order admitting will of decedent to probate at least prima facie establishes their interest. Id., 434. Executor's failure to appeal from Probate Court decree holding assignment by his decedent taxable as antemortem transfer could not be remedied by affirmative claim questioning taxability of transfer in executor's answer to tax commissioner's appeal from two other decisions in decree. 28 CS 210. Each probate appellant stands on his own feet and court will not permit another to join by citing him in. Id., 392. Cited. 34 CS 107; 38 CS 54; 39 CS 63; Id., 157. Annotations to present section: Cited. 226 C. 80; 228 C. 439; 237 C. 12; Id., 233; 238 C. 839; 239 C. 553. Superior Court has statutory authority to hear and determine appeals brought by person aggrieved by any Probate Court order, denial or decree. 276 C. 526. Cited. 27 CA 333; Id., 479; 30 CA 334; 34 CA 579; 36 CA 143; 37 CA 137. Plaintiff was “aggrieved person” under section because of the combination of circumstances including fact that he was the person's only child, heir and had previously had power of attorney and the subsequent appointment of essential strangers as conservators threatened his ability to continue his relationship with his mother without being subject to control by the conservators. 84 CA 486. Cited. 44 CS 169; 45 CS 533. An appeal from probate is not a civil action and therefore a party appealing to Superior Court from probate is required to commence the appeal by filing the complaint with the court within 30 days of the mailing of the challenged decision. 51 CS 148. Subsec. (a): There must be certainty, as distinguished from possibility, that a legally protected interest has been adversely affected in order for party to establish standing before Probate Court; the legally protected interest that may be affected must be an interest in the same matter before Probate Court, and not a protected interest in a different matter. 276 C. 782. Section's limitation period does not conflict with the general provisions of Sec. 51-53(a) addressing the duties of a court clerk. 323 C. 377. Cited. 45 CA 490. The changes made by P.A. 07-116 reveal a clear legislative intent to simplify and clarify probate appeal process and eliminated previous requirement that aggrieved party file a motion with the Probate Court for permission to file an appeal. 116 CA 59. Because the Probate Court proceeding was not initiated pursuant to any of the enumerated statutes, and the hearing did not satisfy the requirements of Sec. 51-72 or 51-73, plaintiff was entitled to a trial de novo. 124 CA 371.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 45a-105
Uniform fees in Probate Courts.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 45a-186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/45a-186.