Connecticut Statutes

§ 38a-815 — (Formerly Sec. 38-60). Unfair practice prohibited.

Connecticut § 38a-815
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 38aInsurance
Ch. 704Unfair and Prohibited Practices

This text of Connecticut § 38a-815 ((Formerly Sec. 38-60). Unfair practice prohibited.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-815 (2026).

Text

No person shall engage in this state in any trade practice which is defined in section 38a-816 as, or determined pursuant to sections 38a-817 and 38a-818 to be, an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance, nor shall any domestic insurance company engage outside of this state in any act or practice defined in subsections (1) to (12), inclusive, of section 38a-816. The commissioner shall have power to examine the affairs of every person engaged in the business of insurance in this state in order to determine whether such person has been or is engaged in any unfair method of competition or in any unfair or deceptive act or practice prohibited by sections 38a-815 to 38a-819, inclusive. When used in said sections, “person” means any ind

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.
936 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. Connecticut, 2013)
40 case citations
Cole v. Aetna Life & Casualty
70 F. Supp. 2d 106 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
27 case citations
Cohn v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
189 F.R.D. 209 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
22 case citations
Liston-Smith v. Csaa Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
287 F. Supp. 3d 153 (D. Connecticut, 2017)
15 case citations
Martin v. American Equity Insurance
185 F. Supp. 2d 162 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
14 case citations
C M Technology, Inc. v. the Travelers Ins. Co., No. 072968 (Apr. 5, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 3959 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
12 case citations
American Home Assurance Co. v. Abrams
69 F. Supp. 2d 339 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
10 case citations
DiPietro-Kay Corp. v. Interactive Benefits Corp.
825 F. Supp. 459 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
8 case citations
Karen L. v. Physicians Health Services, Inc.
202 F.R.D. 94 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
7 case citations
Western World Insurance v. Architectural Builders of Westport, LLC
520 F. Supp. 2d 408 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
6 case citations
Hurlburt v. Mass. Homeland Ins. Co.
310 F. Supp. 3d 333 (D. Connecticut, 2018)
5 case citations
Hipsky v. Allstate Insurance
304 F. Supp. 2d 284 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
5 case citations
Peck v. Public Service Mutual Insurance
114 F. Supp. 2d 51 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
5 case citations
United States Ex Rel. Polied Environmental Services, Inc. v. Incor Group, Inc.
238 F. Supp. 2d 456 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
5 case citations
Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan, Corp. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.
199 F. Supp. 3d 559 (D. Connecticut, 2016)
4 case citations
Guillory v. Allstate Insurance
476 F. Supp. 2d 171 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
4 case citations
Traylor v. Awwa
88 F. Supp. 3d 102 (D. Connecticut, 2015)
3 case citations
Bailey-Gates v. Aetna Life Insurance
890 F. Supp. 73 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
3 case citations
Martin v. Reliance Insurance
954 F. Supp. 476 (D. Connecticut, 1997)
3 case citations
Citizens Communications Co. v. Trustmark Insurance
303 F. Supp. 2d 197 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
2 case citations

Legislative History

(1955, S. 2816d; P.A. 73-73, S. 1; P.A. 79-318, S. 2; P.A. 95-79, S. 149, 189; P.A. 96-193, S. 18, 36.) History: P.A. 73-73 added revised reference to include Subsecs. (6) to (11) of Sec. 38-61; P.A. 79-318 revised reference to Sec. 38-61 to include Subsec. (2); Sec. 38-60 transferred to Sec. 38a-815 in 1991; P.A. 95-79 redefined “person” to include a limited liability company, effective May 31, 1995; P.A. 96-193 substituted “producer” for “agent” and “broker”, effective June 3, 1996. Annotations to former section 38-60: Cited. 186 C. 507. Legislative intent is to make insurance practices subject to both the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. 199 C. 651. Cited. 206 C. 668; 216 C. 830. Cited. 9 CA 622; 13 CA 208. Cited. 39 CS 206; 40 CS 299; Id., 336. Annotations to present section: Cited. 219 C. 644; 229 C. 842; 231 C. 756; 239 C. 658. A common-law breach of fiduciary duty arising in the insurance context that does not violate CUIPA or some other statute regulating the insurance industry cannot provide the basis for a valid CUTPA claim; legislative intent in passing CUIPA was to occupy the field with regard to unfair trade practices in the insurance industry. 310 C. 1. Cited. 45 CA 368.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 38a-815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/38a-815.