Connecticut Statutes
§ 38a-815 — (Formerly Sec. 38-60). Unfair practice prohibited.
Connecticut § 38a-815
This text of Connecticut § 38a-815 ((Formerly Sec. 38-60). Unfair practice prohibited.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-815 (2026).
Text
No person shall engage in this state in any trade practice which is defined in section 38a-816 as, or determined pursuant to sections 38a-817 and 38a-818 to be, an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance, nor shall any domestic insurance company engage outside of this state in any act or practice defined in subsections (1) to (12), inclusive, of section 38a-816. The commissioner shall have power to examine the affairs of every person engaged in the business of insurance in this state in order to determine whether such person has been or is engaged in any unfair method of competition or in any unfair or deceptive act or practice prohibited by sections 38a-815 to 38a-819, inclusive. When used in said sections, “person” means any ind
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.
936 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. Connecticut, 2013)
Cole v. Aetna Life & Casualty
70 F. Supp. 2d 106 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Cohn v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
189 F.R.D. 209 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Liston-Smith v. Csaa Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
287 F. Supp. 3d 153 (D. Connecticut, 2017)
Martin v. American Equity Insurance
185 F. Supp. 2d 162 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
C M Technology, Inc. v. the Travelers Ins. Co., No. 072968 (Apr. 5, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 3959 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
American Home Assurance Co. v. Abrams
69 F. Supp. 2d 339 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
DiPietro-Kay Corp. v. Interactive Benefits Corp.
825 F. Supp. 459 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
Karen L. v. Physicians Health Services, Inc.
202 F.R.D. 94 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Western World Insurance v. Architectural Builders of Westport, LLC
520 F. Supp. 2d 408 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
Hurlburt v. Mass. Homeland Ins. Co.
310 F. Supp. 3d 333 (D. Connecticut, 2018)
Hipsky v. Allstate Insurance
304 F. Supp. 2d 284 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Peck v. Public Service Mutual Insurance
114 F. Supp. 2d 51 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
United States Ex Rel. Polied Environmental Services, Inc. v. Incor Group, Inc.
238 F. Supp. 2d 456 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan, Corp. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.
199 F. Supp. 3d 559 (D. Connecticut, 2016)
Guillory v. Allstate Insurance
476 F. Supp. 2d 171 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
Traylor v. Awwa
88 F. Supp. 3d 102 (D. Connecticut, 2015)
Bailey-Gates v. Aetna Life Insurance
890 F. Supp. 73 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
Martin v. Reliance Insurance
954 F. Supp. 476 (D. Connecticut, 1997)
Citizens Communications Co. v. Trustmark Insurance
303 F. Supp. 2d 197 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Legislative History
(1955, S. 2816d; P.A. 73-73, S. 1; P.A. 79-318, S. 2; P.A. 95-79, S. 149, 189; P.A. 96-193, S. 18, 36.) History: P.A. 73-73 added revised reference to include Subsecs. (6) to (11) of Sec. 38-61; P.A. 79-318 revised reference to Sec. 38-61 to include Subsec. (2); Sec. 38-60 transferred to Sec. 38a-815 in 1991; P.A. 95-79 redefined “person” to include a limited liability company, effective May 31, 1995; P.A. 96-193 substituted “producer” for “agent” and “broker”, effective June 3, 1996. Annotations to former section 38-60: Cited. 186 C. 507. Legislative intent is to make insurance practices subject to both the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. 199 C. 651. Cited. 206 C. 668; 216 C. 830. Cited. 9 CA 622; 13 CA 208. Cited. 39 CS 206; 40 CS 299; Id., 336. Annotations to present section: Cited. 219 C. 644; 229 C. 842; 231 C. 756; 239 C. 658. A common-law breach of fiduciary duty arising in the insurance context that does not violate CUIPA or some other statute regulating the insurance industry cannot provide the basis for a valid CUTPA claim; legislative intent in passing CUIPA was to occupy the field with regard to unfair trade practices in the insurance industry. 310 C. 1. Cited. 45 CA 368.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 38a-1000
Applicability.§ 38a-1001
Definitions.§ 38a-1005
Examination of group. Costs.§ 38a-1006
Group board of trustees.§ 38a-1011
Taxes.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 38a-815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/38a-815.