This text of Connecticut § 36a-760i (Court action based on lender's failure to comply with statutory requirements.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
(a)A borrower who has been injured by a violation of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h, inclusive, may bring a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction by the date three years after the date of the closing for the following: The greater of actual damages or one thousand dollars; and costs and reasonable attorney's fees, unless:
(1)By the date ninety days after the date of the loan closing and prior to the commencement of any action against a lender under this section, the borrower is notified by the lender of the compliance failure, the lender tenders appropriate restitution and the lender either (A) makes the nonprime home loan comply with the applicable provisions of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive; or (B) changes the terms of the mortgage in a manner beneficial to the borrower
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a) A borrower who has been injured by a violation of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h, inclusive, may bring a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction by the date three years after the date of the closing for the following: The greater of actual damages or one thousand dollars; and costs and reasonable attorney's fees, unless: (1) By the date ninety days after the date of the loan closing and prior to the commencement of any action against a lender under this section, the borrower is notified by the lender of the compliance failure, the lender tenders appropriate restitution and the lender either (A) makes the nonprime home loan comply with the applicable provisions of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive; or (B) changes the terms of the mortgage in a manner beneficial to the borrower so that the mortgage will no longer be considered a nonprime home loan subject to the provisions of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive; or (2) The lender is able to show by a preponderance of evidence that the compliance failure was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid such errors. For the purposes of this subdivision, the phrase “bona fide error” includes, but is not limited to, a clerical, calculation, printing, computer malfunction or programming error, but does not include an error of legal judgment with respect to a lender's obligations under the relevant provisions of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive. In actions where the compliance failure has caused material injury to the borrower, the lender shall also be able to show that it cured the compliance failure or otherwise undertook reasonable remedial steps to address or compensate for the injury; or (3) The lender and borrower otherwise reach a mutual agreement on an appropriate remedy or curative action. (b) In addition, the court may grant an injured borrower such relief as it deems just and equitable. (c) A borrower or mortgagor may assert fraud and any violation of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive, which causes material injury to a borrower as a counterclaim or defense to foreclosure by the date six years after the date of the closing. (d) Nothing in this section shall be construed as creating or permitting a cause of action or defense or counterclaim against an assignee of a nonprime home loan or other mortgage loan with respect to a violation of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive, by the originating lender or mortgage broker.