Connecticut Statutes
§ 35-53 — Damages. Punitive damages for wilful and malicious misappropriation.
Connecticut § 35-53
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 35Trade Regulations, Trademarks and Collective and Certification Marks
Ch. 625Uniform Trade Secrets Act
This text of Connecticut § 35-53 (Damages. Punitive damages for wilful and malicious misappropriation.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 35-53 (2026).
Text
(a)In addition to or in lieu of injunctive relief, a complainant may recover damages for the actual loss caused by misappropriation. A complainant also may recover for the unjust enrichment caused by misappropriation that is not taken into account in computing damages for actual loss.
(b)In any action brought pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, if the court finds wilful and malicious misappropriation, the court may award punitive damages in an amount not exceeding twice any award made under subsection (a) and may award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
On-Line Technologies v. Perkin Elmer Corp.
141 F. Supp. 2d 246 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
767 F. Supp. 2d 324 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
Lcd Lighting, Inc. v. Voltarc, Inc., No. Cv 02-0462839 (Mar. 24, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 3649 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
Legislative History
(P.A. 83-344, S. 4.) Subsec. (b): Trial court's finding of willful and malicious misappropriation was supported by the record and trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding punitive damages and attorneys' fees. 251 C. 59. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding $40,000 in punitive damages, inasmuch as award did not exceed twice the amount of the award of compensatory damages. 267 C. 456. Since defendant's attempted takeover of plaintiff employer was not intended to injure the shareholder owners of a trade secret and did not constitute a malicious violation of Uniform Trade Secrets Act, plaintiff was not entitled to punitive damages and attorneys fees. 282 C. 209.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 35-1
Use of fictitious business names. Prohibitions and exceptions. Penalty. Unfair trade practices.§ 35-11a
Definitions.§ 35-11c
Application for registration.§ 35-11g
Cancellation of registration.§ 35-11h
Classes of goods and services.§ 35-11i
Illegal use of mark. Remedies.§ 35-11j
Fraudulent registration.§ 35-11k
Common law rights not affected.§ 35-18a
Definitions.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 35-53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/35-53.