Connecticut Statutes

§ 35-53 — Damages. Punitive damages for wilful and malicious misappropriation.

Connecticut·Title 35 Trade Regulations, Trademarks and Collective and Certification Marks·Ch. 625 Uniform Trade Secrets Act
(a)In addition to or in lieu of injunctive relief, a complainant may recover damages for the actual loss caused by misappropriation. A complainant also may recover for the unjust enrichment caused by misappropriation that is not taken into account in computing damages for actual loss.
(b)In any action brought pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, if the court finds wilful and malicious misappropriation, the court may award punitive damages in an amount not exceeding twice any award made under subsection (a) and may award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connecticut § 35-53 (Damages. Punitive damages for wilful and malicious misappropriation.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

On-Line Technologies v. Perkin Elmer Corp.
141 F. Supp. 2d 246 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
18 case citations
Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
767 F. Supp. 2d 324 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
6 case citations
Lcd Lighting, Inc. v. Voltarc, Inc., No. Cv 02-0462839 (Mar. 24, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 3649 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)

Legislative History

(P.A. 83-344, S. 4.) Subsec. (b): Trial court's finding of willful and malicious misappropriation was supported by the record and trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding punitive damages and attorneys' fees. 251 C. 59. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding $40,000 in punitive damages, inasmuch as award did not exceed twice the amount of the award of compensatory damages. 267 C. 456. Since defendant's attempted takeover of plaintiff employer was not intended to injure the shareholder owners of a trade secret and did not constitute a malicious violation of Uniform Trade Secrets Act, plaintiff was not entitled to punitive damages and attorneys fees. 282 C. 209.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗