Connecticut Statutes
§ 35-42 — Investigation of alleged violation. Issuance of subpoenas and written interrogatories. Enforcement of compliance. Cooperation. Service. Confidential material.
Connecticut § 35-42
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 35Trade Regulations, Trademarks and Collective and Certification Marks
Ch. 624Connecticut Antitrust Act
This text of Connecticut § 35-42 (Investigation of alleged violation. Issuance of subpoenas and written interrogatories. Enforcement of compliance. Cooperation. Service. Confidential material.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 35-42 (2026).
Text
(a)Whenever the Attorney General, his or her deputy or any assistant attorney general designated by the Attorney General, has reason to believe that any person has violated any of the provisions of this chapter, he or she may, prior to instituting any action or proceeding against such person, issue in writing and cause to be served upon any person, by subpoena duces tecum, a demand requiring such person to submit to him or her documentary material relevant to the scope of the alleged violation. For the purposes of this section, “documentary material” includes, but is not limited to, any information in a written, recorded or electronic form.
(b)Such demand shall (1) state the nature of the alleged violation, (2) describe the class or classes of documentary material to be reproduced thereu
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
(1971, P.A. 608, S. 19; P.A. 73-668, S. 3, 4; P.A. 75-508, S. 3, 7; 75-567, S. 13, 80; P.A. 78-280, S. 6, 127; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 95-220, S. 4–6; P.A. 09-68, S. 1; P.A. 13-85, S. 1; P.A. 23-98, S. 2.) History: P.A. 73-668 added Subsec. (e)(2) authorizing issuance of written interrogatories and Subsec. (g) re attorney general's cooperation with officials of federal government and other states; P.A. 75-508 authorized actions by assistant attorney general, specified in Subsec. (e)(2) that responses shall “be under oath”, added Subsec. (f)(2) re orders requiring payment of civil penalties and added Subsec. (h) re service of subpoenas, etc.; P.A. 75-567 substituted “chapter” for “part”; P.A. 78-280 substituted “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” for “Hartford county” in Subsec. (f); P.A. 88-230 replaced “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” with “judicial district of Hartford”, effective September 1, 1991; P.A. 90-98 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1991, to September 1, 1993; P.A. 93-142 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1993, to September 1, 1996, effective June 14, 1993; P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 09-68 amended Subsec. (a) to add definition of “documentary material”, amended Subsec. (b) to replace “documents” with “documentary material”, amended Subsec. (c) to designate existing provisions as Subdiv. (1) and amend same to replace “documents” with “documentary material”, make provisions applicable to documentary material furnished pursuant to demand issued under Subsec. (a) and provide that material shall be returned to person “furnishing such documentary material”, and to add Subdiv. (2) re custody, availability and return of documentary material or other information furnished voluntarily to Attorney General and identity of the person furnishing such material or information, amended Subsec. (f) to increase maximum civil penalty from $500 to $2,000 and made technical changes throughout, effective July 1, 2009; P.A. 13-85 added Subsec. (i) re confidential material; P.A. 23-98 amended Subsec. (c) by adding provisions re documentary material furnished in electronic format and making technical and conforming changes, effective July 1, 2023. Cited. 169 C. 344. Not proper for court to make determination as to substantive applicability of antitrust act upon application for order of compliance with subpoena under section. 179 C. 324. Cited. 190 C. 510; 212 C. 661. Future court is not bound by trial court's rejection of plaintiff's interpretation of confidentiality provisions of section, as decision was interlocutory. 288 C. 646. Section bars disclosure of material and information gathered in antitrust investigation under section to all persons outside Attorney General's office, with the exception of officials of other states and the federal government, provided Attorney General first obtains agreements from such officials that they will abide by the same confidentiality restrictions to which Attorney General is subject. 297 C. 710. Subpoena duces tecum: Issuance equals reasonable belief of violation, not criminal in nature, not to be fishing expedition, evidence produced by, confidential. 30 CS 87. Constitutionality upheld. 32 CS 198.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 35-1
Use of fictitious business names. Prohibitions and exceptions. Penalty. Unfair trade practices.§ 35-11a
Definitions.§ 35-11c
Application for registration.§ 35-11g
Cancellation of registration.§ 35-11h
Classes of goods and services.§ 35-11i
Illegal use of mark. Remedies.§ 35-11j
Fraudulent registration.§ 35-11k
Common law rights not affected.§ 35-18a
Definitions.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 35-42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/35-42.