Connecticut Statutes
§ 35-32 — Attorney General to bring actions in the name of state or as parens patriae.
Connecticut § 35-32
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 35Trade Regulations, Trademarks and Collective and Certification Marks
Ch. 624Connecticut Antitrust Act
This text of Connecticut § 35-32 (Attorney General to bring actions in the name of state or as parens patriae.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 35-32 (2026).
Text
(a)The Attorney General, in the name of the state and on behalf of the people of the state, shall enforce the provisions of this chapter. He shall investigate suspected violations and institute proceedings, for any violation of the provisions of this chapter. Such proceedings may pray that such violation be temporarily or permanently enjoined, or otherwise prohibited.
(b)The Attorney General may also, in his discretion, intervene and appear in any proceeding pending before any court, agency, board, or commission in this state in which matters related to this chapter are in issue.
(c)The Attorney General may also, in enforcing the provisions of this chapter, bring an action in the name of the state as (1) parens patriae for persons residing in the state with respect to damages sustained
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Philip Morris, Inc. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Co. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, USA Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General
123 F.3d 103 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Connecticut v. Levi Strauss & Co.
471 F. Supp. 363 (D. Connecticut, 1979)
State of Conn. v. Levi Strauss & Co.
471 F. Supp. 363 (D. Connecticut, 1979)
Connecticut v. MOODY'S CORPORATION
664 F. Supp. 2d 196 (D. Connecticut, 2009)
Philip Morris Inc. v. Blumenthal
949 F. Supp. 93 (D. Connecticut, 1996)
Connecticut v. Sandoz, Inc.
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Connecticut v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Connecticut Ex Rel. Blumenthal v. Tobacco Valley Sanitation Service Co.
818 F. Supp. 504 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
Legislative History
(1971, P.A. 608, S. 9; P.A. 75-508, S. 1, 7; 75-567, S. 5, 80; P.A. 76-218.) History: P.A. 75-508 and P.A. 75-567 substituted “chapter” for “part”, specified that attorney general acts “in the name of the state and on behalf of the people of the state”, specified that proceedings “may pray that such violation be temporarily or permanently enjoined, or otherwise prohibited” and added Subsec. (b); P.A. 76-218 added Subsecs. (c) and (d). Cited. 169 C. 344; 177 C. 218; 179 C. 324; 184 C. 285; 212 C. 661. Subsec. (c): Subdiv. (2) affords the state standing to pursue a parens patriae claim for damages to its general economy caused by violations of the Connecticut Antitrust Act. 286 C. 454.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 35-1
Use of fictitious business names. Prohibitions and exceptions. Penalty. Unfair trade practices.§ 35-11a
Definitions.§ 35-11c
Application for registration.§ 35-11g
Cancellation of registration.§ 35-11h
Classes of goods and services.§ 35-11i
Illegal use of mark. Remedies.§ 35-11j
Fraudulent registration.§ 35-11k
Common law rights not affected.§ 35-18a
Definitions.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 35-32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/35-32.