Connecticut § 32-604 Feasibility and implementation study.

Connecticut Statutes

§ 32-604 — Feasibility and implementation study.

Connecticut § 32-604

Title 32Commerce and Economic and Community Development

Ch. 588xCapital Region Development Authority

This text of Connecticut § 32-604 (Feasibility and implementation study.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 32-604 (2026).

Text

(a)The Capital Region Development Authority shall conduct a feasibility and implementation study to determine the financial feasibility of the convention center project, as defined in subdivision (3) of section 32-600, and the sportsplex and the parking facilities, each as defined in section 32-651, which shall include, but not be limited to, consideration of proper planning, engineering, siting, cost of construction, revenue and expense projections and operation as a multipurpose facility or facilities.

(b)The authority shall determine if the feasibility and implementation study clearly establishes, considering all relevant factors, the financial viability of (1) the convention center, (2) the sportsplex, (3) the parking facilities, or (4) any combination of the foregoing. The authority

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) The Capital Region Development Authority shall conduct a feasibility and implementation study to determine the financial feasibility of the convention center project, as defined in subdivision (3) of section 32-600, and the sportsplex and the parking facilities, each as defined in section 32-651, which shall include, but not be limited to, consideration of proper planning, engineering, siting, cost of construction, revenue and expense projections and operation as a multipurpose facility or facilities. (b) The authority shall determine if the feasibility and implementation study clearly establishes, considering all relevant factors, the financial viability of (1) the convention center, (2) the sportsplex, (3) the parking facilities, or (4) any combination of the foregoing. The authority shall deliver the implementation and feasibility study, together with its determination as to financial viability, to the Governor for submission to the General Assembly as part of the master development plan pursuant to subsection (b) of section 32-654 . (c) The Capital Region Development Authority shall conduct a feasibility and implementation study to determine the financial feasibility of undertaking development and redevelopment projects to further the purposes of the authority, which shall include, but not be limited to, consideration of proper planning, engineering, siting, cost of construction, revenue and expense projections and operational costs. (d) The authority shall monitor the progress of all capital city projects, projects in East Hartford and any project in the capital region and shall, on a regular basis, determine the extent to which each such project has, up to that point, met the purposes set forth in section 32-602 . The authority shall report semiannually to the Governor and the General Assembly in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a with respect to the operations, finances and achievement of its economic development objectives. (e) The authority shall review and evaluate the progress of each capital city project and any project in the capital region for which financing is provided and shall devise and employ techniques for forecasting and measuring relevant indices of accomplishment of its goals of economic development, including, but not limited to, (1) the number of jobs created, or to be created, by or as a result of the project, (2) the cost or estimated cost, to the authority, involved in the creation of those jobs, (3) the amount of private capital investment in, or stimulated by, a project, in proportion to the public funds invested in such project, (4) the number of additional businesses created and associated jobs, (5) increased housing availability in downtown Hartford, and (6) the impact on tourism.

Legislative History

(P.A. 98-179, S. 5, 30; P.A. 99-241, S. 20, 66; P.A. 12-147, S. 13; P.A. 13-123, S. 32.) History: P.A. 98-179 effective June 1, 1998; P.A. 99-241 deleted Subsec. (c) re economic viability determination, amended Subsec. (b) to add parking facilities or any combination, required that study be delivered to the Governor as part of the master development plan and made technical changes, effective July 1, 1999; P.A. 12-147 added new Subsec. (c) re feasibility and implementation study by Capital Region Development Authority, redesignated existing Subsecs. (c) and (d) as Subsecs. (d) and (e), amended redesignated Subsec. (d) by adding provision re projects in East Hartford and any project in capital region and amended redesignated Subsec. (e) by adding provision re any project in the capital region, adding new Subdiv. (5) re increased housing availability and redesignating existing Subdiv. (5) as Subdiv. (6), effective June 15, 2012; P.A. 13-123 changed “Capital City Economic Development Authority” to “Capital Region Development Authority” in Subsec. (a), effective June 18, 2013.