Connecticut Statutes

§ 29-35 — Carrying of pistol or revolver without permit prohibited. Knowingly carrying any firearm with intent to display such firearm prohibited. Exceptions.

Connecticut § 29-35
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 29Public Safety and State Police
Ch. 529Division of State Police

This text of Connecticut § 29-35 (Carrying of pistol or revolver without permit prohibited. Knowingly carrying any firearm with intent to display such firearm prohibited. Exceptions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 29-35 (2026).

Text

(a)(1) No person shall carry any pistol or revolver upon such person's person, except when such person is within such person's dwelling house, on land leased or owned by such person or within the place of business of such person, without a permit to carry the same issued as provided in section 29-28.
(2)No person shall knowingly carry any firearm with intent to display such firearm, except when such person is within such person's dwelling house, on land leased, owned or otherwise possessed by such person or within the place of business of such person, or such person is engaged in firearm training or bona fide hunting activity, or such person has been explicitly permitted by another person to carry such firearm with intent to display such firearm while within such other person's dwelling h

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuck v. Danaher
822 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
57 case citations
Robert Williams v. Frederick E. Adams, Warden, Connecticut State Prison
436 F.2d 30 (Second Circuit, 1971)
45 case citations
United States v. Gary Mills
412 F.3d 325 (Second Circuit, 2005)
24 case citations
United States v. Enid Salter A/K/A Aaron Salter
521 F.2d 1326 (Second Circuit, 1975)
23 case citations
Williams v. Barr
960 F.3d 68 (Second Circuit, 2020)
9 case citations
United States v. Bifield
498 F. Supp. 497 (D. Connecticut, 1980)
7 case citations
United States v. Thomas
363 F. Supp. 2d 84 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
3 case citations
United States v. Bowers
490 F. Supp. 2d 285 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
1 case citations
Johnson v. Warden, No. 99-0549240 (Sep. 29, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 11858 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
1 case citations
In Re Turner, No. Cr97-130092 (Feb. 22, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 2640 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Bates v. Warden, No. Cv97-0002548 (Nov. 14, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14588 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
State v. Carroll, No. Cr91-60685 (Jul. 23, 1993)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6581-F (Connecticut Superior Court, 1993)
State v. Austin, No. Cr96-365291 (Oct. 26, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14365 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Jones v. State, No. Cv93 0354971 (Dec. 14, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 12744 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
State v. Ramos, No. Cr92-72139 (Jan. 6, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 339 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
State v. Rice, No. Cr94-4057388 (Nov. 27, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 15941-cd (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
State v. Edmonds, No. Cr6-398306 (Aug. 23, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 9219 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
State v. Commerford, No. Cr89-34-682 (Sep. 24, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5433-XXX (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Carmon v. Warden, No. Cv 98-0411202 S (Nov. 5, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14123 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 4166; 1957, P.A. 163, S. 35; 1959, P.A. 179; 1963, P.A. 437; P.A. 81-45; 81-222, S. 2; P.A. 88-128, S. 1; P.A. 99-212, S. 2; P.A. 00-99, S. 77, 154; P.A. 01-130, S. 9; P.A. 03-19, S. 68; P.A. 11-213, S. 47; P.A. 15-216, S. 2; P.A. 16-193, S. 9; P.A. 23-53, S. 1; 23-203, S. 1.) History: 1959 act exempted parole officers from provisions of section; 1963 act exempted persons en route to or at competitions, meetings, exhibitions etc. from provisions of section if persons are U.S. residents and have permits from other states; P.A. 81-45 clarified exemption for sheriffs, parole officers or peace officers by specifying those of this state, or of any other state while engaged in the pursuit of official duties, and added exemption for federal marshal or federal law enforcement agent; P.A. 81-222 provided an exemption for any person carrying a pistol or revolver to and from a testing range at the request of the issuing authority or carrying an antique pistol or revolver; P.A. 88-128 added Subsec. (b) to require a permit holder to carry his permit while carrying his pistol or revolver; P.A. 99-212 replaced “carrying” with “transporting” in list of exceptions other than in exceptions for sheriffs, parole officers, peace officers, federal marshals, federal law enforcement agents, members of the armed forces and members of any military organization, added exception for transporting a pistol or revolver in or through the state for the purpose of “taking part in formal pistol or revolver training” or “repairing such pistol or revolver”, revised exception re out-of-state resident by replacing condition that such person have “a permit or license to carry any firearm issued by the authority of any other state or subdivision of the United States” with condition that such person “is permitted to possess and carry a pistol or revolver in the state or subdivision of the United States in which such person resides”, added definitions of “formal pistol or revolver training” and “transporting a pistol or revolver” and made provisions of section gender neutral; P.A. 00-99 deleted references to sheriff in Subsec. (a), effective December 1, 2000; P.A. 01-130 amended definition of “transporting a pistol or revolver” in Subsec. (a) re providing for a locked container if motor vehicle does not have compartment separate from passenger compartment; P.A. 03-19 made technical changes in Subsec. (a), effective May 12, 2003; P.A. 11-213 amended Subsec. (a) to exempt Department of Motor Vehicles inspectors, effective July 1, 2011; P.A. 15-216 amended Subsec. (b) to add provision re presentation of permit; P.A. 16-193 made a technical change in Subsec. (a); P.A. 23-53 amended Subsec. (a) by making technical and conforming changes, designating existing provision re carrying pistol or revolver without a permit as Subdiv. (1) and therein adding “on land leased or owned by such person or within the place of business of such person” to the list of exceptions, adding Subdiv. (2) re knowingly carrying any firearm with intent to display such firearm, designating language re lack of applicability of provisions as Subdiv. (3), Subdiv. applicable to any firearm rather than any pistol or revolver, and dividing Subdiv. into Subparas. (A) to (L) substantially amending same, designating language re definitions as Subdiv. (4) and amending same to redefine “formal pistol or revolver training” as “firearm training” and “transporting a pistol or revolver” as “transporting a firearm”, added Subsec. (c) re report to Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at The University of Connecticut and added Subsec. (d) re review of reported incidents; P.A. 23-203 amended Subsec. (a)(2) by replacing “leased or owned” with “leased, owned or otherwise possessed”, adding language re person explicitly permitted by another to carry such firearm and language providing that provisions do not apply to persons described in Subparas. (A) to (C), amended Subsec. (a)(3) by redesignating Subpara. (A)(i) re parole officer or peace officer of this state as Subpara. (A), redesignating Subpara. (A)(ii) re parole officer or peace officer of any other state as new Subpara. (B) and redesignating existing Subparas. (B) to (L) as Subparas. (C) to (M). Seizure of loaded revolver from defendant's person and arrest under section by police lieutenant on information by reliable person that defendant was armed is justifiable action. 157 C. 114. Cited. 162 C. 3; 168 C. 395. State must introduce evidence that pistol which defendant was carrying was less than 12 inches in length in order to prove that defendant has violated section. 173 C. 254. Cited. 179 C. 576. Burden not on state to disprove every listed exception in statute. 181 C. 388. Cited. 182 C. 262; 186 C. 261; Id., 654; 189 C. 303; 190 C. 1; 192 C. 85; 193 C. 7; 195 C. 651; 196 C. 122; Id., 157; 207 C. 191; 208 C. 689; 209 C. 322; 211 C. 258; 214 C. 540; 215 C. 739; 217 C. 73; 220 C. 385; 221 C. 315; Id., 915; 222 C. 718; 225 C. 270; 227 C. 518; 228 C. 234; 229 C. 125; 231 C. 43; 233 C. 1; Id., 215; Id., 813; 234 C. 324; 235 C. 274; Id., 397; Id., 595; 240 C. 395; 242 C. 318. Cited. 3 CA 225; Id., 289; 6 CA 189; Id., 402; 7 CA 367; 8 CA 667; 9 CA 169; judgment reversed, see 205 C. 370; Id., 330; 10 CA 532; Id., 683; Id., 697; 12 CA 662; 13 CA 139; 14 CA 140; 15 CA 330; Id., 749; 17 CA 243; 19 CA 576; 22 CA 507; 24 CA 408; Id., 685; Id., 692; Id., 737; 25 CA 433; Id., 578; Id., 734; 26 CA 65; Id., 367; 27 CA 263; Id., 403; 28 CA 833; judgment reversed, see 227 C. 518; 30 CA 26; Id., 68; 31 CA 385; Id., 614; 32 CA 724; 34 CA 103; Id., 223; 35 CA 541; 36 CA 345; Id., 483; Id., 576; Id., 805; Id., 831; 37 CA 276; 38 CA 247; 39 CA 82; Id., 224; Id., 242; Id., 563; 40 CA 60; Id., 151; Id., 189; 41 CA 515; Id., 565; Id., 831; 42 CA 41; 43 CA 252; 44 CA 790; 45 CA 261; Id., 282; 46 CA 640. Evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support conviction of carrying pistol without a license because state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that gun barrel was less than 12 inches in length. 48 CA 193. State's search of state and city database for evidence of permit to carry pistol was insufficient to meet state's burden of establishing that defendant lacked a valid permit to lawfully carry a pistol on date of incident because state failed to establish that defendant was a resident of the city or had a place of business within the city during the 60-day period immediately preceding the alleged conduct. 156 CA 175; judgment reversed in part, see 324 C. 782. Section is designed to prohibit the carrying of a pistol without a permit and not the mere possession of one; constructive possession of a pistol will not suffice to support a conviction under section; to establish that a defendant carried a pistol or revolver, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he bore a pistol or revolver upon his person while exercising dominion or control of it; because there is no temporal requirement in section, and no requirement that the pistol or revolver be moved from one place to another to prove that it was carried, a defendant can be shown to have carried a pistol or revolver upon his person, within the meaning of section, by evidence proving, inter alia, that he grasped or held it in his hands, arms or clothing or otherwise bore it upon his body for any period of time while maintaining dominion or control over it. 184 CA 332; judgment affirmed, see 335 C. 212. Cited. 27 CS 275; 35 CS 516. Subsec. (a): Cited. 224 C. 546; 237 C. 518. “Place of business” means premises containing a business in which a person has a proprietary, controlling or possessory interest, not a location at which a person is merely employed. 260 C. 219. “Place of business” exception to handgun permit requirement inapplicable to taxicab. 270 C. 198. Cited. 20 CA 137; 22 CA 321; 26 CA 242; 33 CA 521; 35 CA 138; 38 CA 750; 42 CA 768; 45 CA 591; 46 CA 216. Cumulative evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant's firearm had a barrel less than 12 inches long. 69 CA 1. Jury instructions that improperly included an explanation of the principles of constructive possession did not violate defendant's due process rights where such instructions had no probable effect on the jury. 71 CA 656. Court upheld prior rulings that convictions under both this Subsec. and Sec. 53a-217(a)(1) do not constitute double jeopardy. 83 CA 377. To obtain a conviction, the state was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant carried a pistol, for which he lacked a permit, while outside his dwelling house or place of business. 126 CA 192.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 29-35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/29-35.