Connecticut Statutes
§ 29-212 — (Formerly Sec. 19-418l). Assumption of risk of injury caused by hazards inherent in the sport of skiing.
Connecticut § 29-212
This text of Connecticut § 29-212 ((Formerly Sec. 19-418l). Assumption of risk of injury caused by hazards inherent in the sport of skiing.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 29-212 (2026).
Text
(a)For the purposes of this section:
(1)“Skier” includes any person who is using a ski area for the purpose of skiing or who is on the skiable terrain of a ski area as a spectator or otherwise, but does not include (A) any person using a snow tube provided by a ski area operator, and (B) any person who is a spectator while in a designated spectator area during any event;
(2)“Skiing” means sliding downhill or jumping on snow or ice using skis, a snowboard, snow blades, a snowbike, a sit-ski or any other device that is controllable by its edges on snow or ice or is for the purpose of utilizing any skiable terrain, but does not include snow tubing operations provided by a ski area operator; and (3) “Ski area operator” means a person who owns or controls the operation of a ski area and such
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Everett v. Whitewater Mtn. Res., Inc., No. Cv-99-0589207-S (Sep. 17, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 12724 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Murray v. Taylor,, No. Cv 95 0125410 S (Apr. 26, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 4209 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Legislative History
(P.A. 79-629, S. 3; P.A. 05-78, S. 2; P.A. 14-72, S. 4.) History: Sec. 19-418 l transferred to Sec. 29-212 in 1983; P.A. 05-78 added Subsec. (a) defining “skier”, “skiing” and “ski area operator”, designated existing provisions as Subsec. (b) and amended same by making technical changes, replacing “arising out of the hazards” with “caused by the hazards”, deleting provision re proximate cause of injury, adding “conspicuously placed, or, if not so placed,” in Subdiv. (3), replacing “boarding” with “loading, unloading or otherwise using” in Subdiv. (5) and adding exception re collisions with on-duty employees of ski area operator in Subdiv. (6), and added Subsec. (c) re exception when determined that claimant's injury was not caused by hazard inherent in sport of skiing; P.A. 14-72 amended Subsec (b)(1) by replacing reference to Sec. 29-211(3) with reference to Sec. 29-211(2). Phrase “operation of the ski area by the ski area operator” includes not merely the duties enumerated in Sec. 29-211 but also those services offered by a ski area operator as components of its business activities, regardless of whether the services are statutorily or otherwise required; plaintiff may maintain action against ski area operator for injury suffered from collision with employee of operator because negligence of an employee or agent of a ski area operator is not an inherent hazard of the sport of skiing. 269 C. 672.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-108
§ 29-108§ 29-108a
(Formerly Sec. 17-22). Definitions.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 29-212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/29-212.