Connecticut Statutes
§ 20-427 — Holder to exhibit and advertise certificate, when. Prohibited acts. Penalties. Certificates generally not transferable. Expiration. Renewal. Building permits.
Connecticut § 20-427
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 20Professional and Occupational Licensing, Certification, Title Protection and Registration. Examining Boards
Ch. 400Home Improvement Contractors
This text of Connecticut § 20-427 (Holder to exhibit and advertise certificate, when. Prohibited acts. Penalties. Certificates generally not transferable. Expiration. Renewal. Building permits.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-427 (2026).
Text
(a)Each person engaged in making home improvements shall (1) exhibit his certificate of registration upon request by any interested party, (2) state in any advertisement the fact that he is registered, and (3) include his registration number in any advertisement.
(b)No person shall:
(1)Present or attempt to present, as such person's own, the certificate of another, (2) knowingly give false evidence of a material nature to the commissioner for the purpose of procuring a certificate, (3) represent himself or herself falsely as, or impersonate, a registered home improvement contractor or salesman, (4) use or attempt to use a certificate which has expired or which has been suspended or revoked, (5) offer to make or make any home improvement without having a current certificate of registrati
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLC
156 F. Supp. 3d 274 (D. Connecticut, 2015)
Chase v. Cohen
519 F. Supp. 2d 267 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
McClain v. Byers, No. Cv 930301761s (May 6, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 4940 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Walker v. Winston, No. Cv 99 0429373 S (Jan. 22, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1211 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
State v. Roklen, No. Cr02 2002-166 (Oct. 9, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 12764 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Graham v. Viele, No. 352705 (Dec. 6, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7288 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Adams v. Roberts, No. Cv 00 0064599 S (May 3, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5833 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Bustamante v. 43 Corporation, No. 119948 (Oct. 24, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13066 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Legislative History
(P.A. 79-606, S. 10, 14; P.A. 81-361, S. 2, 39; 81-472, S. 136, 159; P.A. 82-315, S. 3; P.A. 88-269, S. 8; P.A. 89-251, S. 149, 203; P.A. 91-325, S. 1; P.A. 94-36, S. 22, 42; 94-68, S. 2; P.A. 96-117, S. 2; P.A. 00-192, S. 79, 102; P.A. 03-167, S. 3; 03-186, S. 2; P.A. 04-257, S. 104; P.A. 08-102, S. 4; P.A. 21-37, S. 29; 21-197, S. 7; P.A. 23-99, S. 15.) History: P.A. 81-361 deleted provision in Subsec. (e) allowing prorated fees lower than application fee and changed the word “issuance” to “effective date”; P.A. 81-472 made technical changes; P.A. 82-315 made violation of chapter an unfair or deceptive trade practice; P.A. 88-269 amended Subsec. (a) to include advertisements, amended Subsec. (b)(3) to include salesmen and added Subsec. (b)(7) and (8) re employment of unregistered salesmen and failure to make refunds, amended Subsec. (f) to increase fee for restoration of expired license from $5 to $10 and added Subsecs. (g), (h) and (i) re restoration, failure to receive notice of expiration and the necessity of the existence of building and construction permits at the beginning of work, deleting obsolete provisions in Subsecs. (d) and (e); P.A. 89-251 amended Subsec. (f) to increase the restoration fee from $10 to $20; P.A. 91-325 amended Subsec. (b) by authorizing court to impose a period of probation of not more than five years in order to ensure that the victims would be fully repaid if the court determined that a contractor could not fully repay his victims within the period of probation established in Sec. 53a-29(d); P.A. 94-36 amended Subsec. (d) by eliminating the alphabetical certificate renewal system and deleted Subsecs. (e) and (f) which provided for prorated certificate application fees and late certificate renewal fees, relettering remaining Subsecs. as necessary, effective January 1, 1995; P.A. 94-68 amended Subsec. (b)(8) by adding the clause allowing the date of the contract to be used if no starting date was specified in the contract, expanded criminal penalties in Subsec. (c) and inserted Subsec. (d) re civil penalties, relettering former Subsecs. (c) to (i), inclusive, accordingly; P.A. 96-117 amended Subsec. (c) to add references to Sec. 54-56e; P.A. 00-192 amended Subsec. (g) to delete provision that certificate shall not be restored unless renewed not later than one year after its expiration and to add provision re waiver of renewal fee for certain home improvement contractors, effective July 1, 2000; P.A. 03-167 made technical changes in Subsec. (b) for the purpose of gender neutrality; P.A. 03-186 amended Subsec. (d) to add provision re minimum penalty for radon mitigation work; P.A. 04-257 made technical changes in Subsec. (d), effective June 14, 2004; P.A. 08-102 amended Subsec. (c) to replace references to “subsection (d) of section 53a-29” with “subsection (d) or (e) of section 53a-29”; P.A. 21-37 amended Subsec. (f) to add March 31 expiration date and exception to certificates expiring November 30, 2021, and added provision re prorated renewal fee, effective June 4, 2021; P.A. 21-197 amended Subsec. (e) to add exception for change in only name or type of business entity, effective July 1, 2022; P.A. 23-99 amended Subsec. (d) by changing amount of penalty from not more than $500 for first violation, $750 for second violation, $1,000 for third or subsequent violation and, in case of radon mitigation work, not less than $250 per violation to not more than $1,500 per violation, effective June 29, 2023. Cited. 224 C. 231; 231 C. 707. Cited. 13 CA 194; 41 CA 476. Subsec. (b): Cited. 215 C. 336; 228 C. 574; 229 C. 516. Subdiv. (5): Although the case against defendant under section was initially dismissed based on statute of limitations, the state's successful appeal on the statute of limitations calculation and subsequent trial did not constitute unlawful double jeopardy. 250 C. 1. Subdiv. (5): Requires current valid license. 19 CA 1. Cited. 45 CA 743. Subdiv. (5): Prosecution after earlier dismissal for expiration of statute of limitations did not constitute double jeopardy. 49 CA 553. “Person” as used in Subdiv. (7) includes a registered contractor. 88 CA 144. Plain language of Subdiv. (5) indicates that provision applies to any “person”, including a subcontractor, and is not limited in application to contractors, and plain meaning of “makes any home improvement” includes installation of kitchen sink and garden window. 137 CA 855. Cited. 44 CS 274. Subsec. (c): Cited. 42 CA 124. Trial court abused its discretion in failing to award at least nominal damages under CUTPA for defendant's violations of Home Improvement Act. 75 CA 334.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 20-1
Healing arts defined.§ 20-10
Qualification for licensure.§ 20-101b
Construction.§ 20-102
Penalty.§ 20-102bb
Nurse's aides: Registry.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 20-427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/20-427.