Connecticut Statutes
§ 18-81 — Duties of commissioner.
Connecticut § 18-81
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 18Correctional Institutions and Department of Correction
Ch. 325Department of Correction
This text of Connecticut § 18-81 (Duties of commissioner.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 18-81 (2026).
Text
The Commissioner of Correction shall administer, coordinate and control the operations of the department and shall be responsible for the overall supervision and direction of all institutions, facilities and activities of the department. The commissioner shall establish rules for the administrative practices and custodial and rehabilitative methods of said institutions and facilities in accordance with recognized correctional standards. The commissioner shall establish, develop and maintain noninstitutional, community-based service programs. The commissioner shall be responsible for the supervision of persons released on parole by the Board of Pardons and Paroles. The commissioner shall be responsible for establishing disciplinary, diagnostic, classification, treatment, vocational and acad
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lareau v. Manson
507 F. Supp. 1177 (D. Connecticut, 1980)
Jones v. Manson
393 F. Supp. 1016 (D. Connecticut, 1975)
Hock v. Thipedeau
238 F. Supp. 2d 446 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
In Re Felicia B., (Jan. 30, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 1172 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
In the Interest of Anthony M., (Apr. 29, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5133 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Lawson v. Warden, No. Cv02-003639 (Mar. 3, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2915 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
In Interest of Kirk R., (Jan. 16, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 902 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Wiseman v. Armstrong, No. Cv02-0821661 S (Feb. 27, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2905 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
Joyner v. Wezner, No. 418200 (Oct. 5, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12214 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Koram v. CT Dept of Corrections
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
In Re Mark W., (Jul. 31, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9565 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Beasley v. Commissioner of Corrections, No. Cv95-2059 (May 12, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5859 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Barfield v. Cook
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
El-Massri v. New Haven Correctional Center
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
Jones v. Schortman
(D. Connecticut, 2023)
Jones v. Beckert
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Quint v. Robinson
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Crispin v. Fortin
(D. Connecticut, 2021)
Carter v. Durant
(D. Connecticut, 2021)
Henderson v. Hanna
(D. Connecticut, 2021)
Legislative History
(1967, P.A. 152, S. 5; P.A. 77-24; 77-526, S. 1, 2; 77-614, S. 271, 610; P.A. 80-200, S. 2, 7; P.A. 93-219, S. 9, 14; P.A. 04-234, S. 2, 33; P.A. 13-164, S. 1.) History: P.A. 77-24 allowed commissioner to appoint designees to act for him; P.A. 77-526 added commissioner's duty to arrange for legal assistance for indigent inmates; P.A. 77-614 deleted reference to consultation with council of correction in establishing rules, effective July 1, 1979; P.A. 80-200 required commissioner to establish, develop and maintain noninstitutional, community-based service programs; P.A. 93-219 deleted responsibility of commissioner to supervise parolees and act as administrator of the interstate compact for parole and probation supervision, reflecting transfer of said responsibilities to board of parole, effective July 1, 1994; P.A. 04-234 added provision requiring commissioner to be responsible for the supervision of persons released on parole and to act as administrator of the Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision and made technical changes for purposes of gender neutrality, effective June 8, 2004, and replaced Board of Parole with Board of Pardons and Paroles, effective July 1, 2004; P.A. 13-164 deleted provision requiring commissioner to act as administrator of the Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision, effective July 1, 2013. The statutory mechanism by which the department imposes sanctions is intended by the legislature to be civil in nature. 168 CA 19. Commissioner's extremely broad discretion under section must be accommodated with rule that prisoner retains basic constitutional rights; habeas corpus provides only practical access of prisoner to courts. 34 CS 89.
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 18-81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/18-81.