Connecticut Statutes
§ 14-242 — Turns restricted. Signals to be given before turning or stopping. U-turns. Left turns. Right turns when passing person riding bicycle, electric bicycle or electric foot scooter.
Connecticut § 14-242
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 14Motor Vehicles. Use of the Highway By Vehicles. Gasoline
Ch. 248Vehicle Highway Use
This text of Connecticut § 14-242 (Turns restricted. Signals to be given before turning or stopping. U-turns. Left turns. Right turns when passing person riding bicycle, electric bicycle or electric foot scooter.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-242 (2026).
Text
(a)No person shall turn a vehicle at an intersection unless the vehicle is in a proper position on the highway as required by section 14-241, or turn a vehicle to enter a private road or driveway or otherwise turn a vehicle from a direct course or move right or left upon a highway unless such movement can be made with reasonable safety. No person shall so turn any vehicle without giving an appropriate signal in the manner provided in section 14-244.
(b)A signal of intention to turn right or left shall be given continuously during not less than the last one hundred feet traveled by the vehicle before turning.
(c)No person shall stop or suddenly decrease the speed of a vehicle without first giving an appropriate signal in the manner provided in section 14-244 to the driver of any vehicle
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Odom v. Matteo
772 F. Supp. 2d 377 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
Donald F. Pfeiffer v. William S. Silver
712 F.2d 799 (Second Circuit, 1983)
State v. Backus, No. Cr98-275728 (Jun. 7, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 6998 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Batson v. Batson, No. Cv91 0289170s (Oct. 20, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10677 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Maiorino v. Maiorino, No. Cv99 0065711s (Nov. 17, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 14224 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Cruz v. Lage, No. Cv 99 0152002 S (Jan. 31, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 1747 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
State v. Dodge, No. Mv-99-614203 (Jun. 2, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 6740 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Almonte v. Krajeskj, No. Cv98-033 27 96 S (Jan. 9, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 366 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Wilkinson v. Comm'r of Dept. Motor Veh., No. Cv97 0057231s (Mar. 9, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 2995 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
United States v. Goins
157 F. Supp. 3d 148 (D. Connecticut, 2016)
Wright v. United States
574 F. Supp. 160 (D. Connecticut, 1983)
Legislative History
(1955, S. 1394d; 1963, P.A. 258; 1971, P.A. 66, S. 1; P.A. 75-577, S. 86, 126; P.A. 00-70; P.A. 18-165, S. 10; P.A. 19-162, S. 8.) History: 1963 act removed qualification in Subsec. (a) that turn without signal should not be made “if any other traffic may be affected by such movement”; 1971 act added Subsec. (e); P.A. 75-577 added Subsec. (f); P.A. 00-70 added new Subsec. (f) to prohibit a person making a right turn in front of a bicyclist unless the turn can be made with reasonable safety and will not impede the travel of the bicyclist and redesignated former Subsec. (f) as Subsec. (g); P.A. 18-165 amended Subsec. (f) to add references to electric bicycle; P.A. 19-162 amended Subsec. (f) to add references to electric foot scooter and make conforming changes. Failure to signal is negligence as a matter of law but such negligence is a question of fact in determining proximate causation. 142 C. 142; 147 C. 187. Former statute cited. 145 C. 187. Violation is negligence per se but charge held adequate which stated that statute required a certain course of action. 146 C. 10. Cited. 149 C. 371. Where, in special defense of contributory negligence, defendant's alleged failure to use care of reasonably prudent person, to keep proper lookout and to operate automobile in such manner as to prevent collision, reference by court in its charge to statute was proper. Id., 386. Cited. 150 C. 355; 155 C. 409; 163 C. 146. Statute places a duty of reasonable safety on a driver who wishes to turn left into a private alleyway. 165 C. 422. Whether defendant violated section and such violation was the proximate cause of plaintiff's damage are questions for the jury. 167 C. 533. Cited. 179 C. 388; 206 C. 608; 234 C. 660. Cited 2 CA 164; 4 CA 451; 17 CA 471; 22 CA 142; 30 CA 742; 36 CA 710; 43 CA 636. Cited. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 694. Subsec. (a): No exception to signal requirement exists merely because there is no risk of collision in making turn. 154 C. 620. Cited. 166 C. 240. Plaintiff stopped his vehicle at curb and then turned left into driveway without signaling; this was violation of this Subsec., not Subsec. (b). 168 C. 64.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 14-1
Definitions.§ 14-100
Safety glass. Use of plastics.§ 14-100c
§ 14-100c§ 14-101
Turn signals.§ 14-103
Inspection of motor vehicles.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 14-242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/14-242.