Connecticut Statutes

§ 14-240 — Vehicles to be driven reasonable distance apart. Exceptions. Operation of platoon.

Connecticut·Title 14 Motor Vehicles. Use of the Highway By Vehicles. Gasoline·Ch. 248 Vehicle Highway Use
(a)As used in this section, “platoon” means two or three commercial motor vehicles or buses, excluding school buses, traveling in a unified manner at electronically coordinated speeds at following distances that are closer than would be reasonable and prudent without such coordination.
(b)Except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, no person operating a motor vehicle shall follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having regard for the speed of such vehicles, the traffic upon and the condition of the highway and weather conditions.
(c)No person operating a motor vehicle shall drive such vehicle in such proximity to another vehicle as to obstruct or impede traffic.
(d)Motor vehicles being driven upon any highway in a caravan shall be so operated as to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connecticut § 14-240 (Vehicles to be driven reasonable distance apart. Exceptions. Operation of platoon.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wrinn v. State
661 A.2d 1034 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)
24 case citations
Menon v. Frinton
170 F. Supp. 2d 190 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
7 case citations
Christman v. Kick
342 F. Supp. 2d 82 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
4 case citations
Simeone v. Bianchi, No. Cv 92-0331356-S (Feb. 28, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 1401-ZZ (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Horan v. Murgio, No. 538130 (May 20, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 6746 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Fusco v. Gillian, No. Cv 98-0489624s (Nov. 25, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 13474 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
TISO v. Blumenthal
371 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D. Connecticut, 2005)

Legislative History

(1955, S. 1392d; P.A. 75-577, S. 84, 126; P.A. 84-372, S. 6, 9; P.A. 96-180, S. 42, 166; P.A. 18-164, S. 29; P.A. 22-40, S. 15.) History: P.A. 75-577 added Subsec. (d); P.A. 84-372 established higher penalty for person operating a commercial vehicle combination; P.A. 96-180 made a technical change in Subsec. (c), effective June 3, 1996; P.A. 18-164 amended Subsec. (d) to designate existing provision re operation of commercial vehicle combination as Subdiv. (1) and add Subdiv. (2) re violation resulting in motor vehicle accident, and made technical and conforming changes; P.A. 22-40 added new Subsec. (a) re defining “platoon”, redesignated existing Subsec. (a) as Subsec. (b) and amended same to add provision re except as provided in Subsec. (e), redesignated existing Subsec. (b) as Subsec. (c), redesignated existing Subsec. (c) as Subsec. (d) and amended same to add provision re operating in platoon, added Subsec. (e) re operation of platoon and redesignated existing Subsec. (d) as Subsec. (f) and amended same by adding “or a commercial motor vehicle or bus in a platoon” in Subdiv. (1), effective July 1, 2022. Cited. 148 C. 266; 150 C. 217. Request to charge statute must be made. 154 C. 381. Cited. 160 C. 128; 166 C. 152; 171 C. 303; 180 C. 415; 185 C. 483; 206 C. 608; 217 C. 73; 231 C. 930. Statute is directed against practice of “tailgating”. 234 C. 401. Cited. Id., 408. Cited. 4 CA 451; 11 CA 122; 17 CA 209. Application of “following too closely” statute discussed; statute directed against practice of “tailgating”; legislature did not intend provisions of statute to apply in all rear-end collisions. 35 CA 464. Cited. 29 CS 21; 39 CS 228. Statute not limited to situations where car ahead is moving. 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 487. Cited. 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 107; 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 697.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗