Connecticut Statutes
§ 12-63 — Rule of valuation. Depreciation schedules.
Connecticut § 12-63
This text of Connecticut § 12-63 (Rule of valuation. Depreciation schedules.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-63 (2026).
Text
(a)The present true and actual value of land classified as farm land pursuant to section 12-107c, as forest land pursuant to section 12-107d, as open space land pursuant to section 12-107e, or as maritime heritage land pursuant to section 12-107g shall be based upon its current use without regard to neighborhood land use of a more intensive nature, provided in no event shall the present true and actual value of open space land be less than it would be if such open space land comprised a part of a tract or tracts of land classified as farm land pursuant to section 12-107c. The present true and actual value of all other property shall be deemed by all assessors and boards of assessment appeals to be the fair market value thereof and not its value at a forced or auction sale.
(b)(1) For the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Yankee Gas Co. v. City of Meriden, No. X07-Cv96 0072560s (Apr. 20, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 5465 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Ireland v. Town of Rocky Hill, No. Cv 94-0461459s (Dec. 12, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 14254 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Fitzgibbons v. Town of Stonington, No. 535204 (Oct. 16, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 8552 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Meadow Street Developers v. Town of Montville, No. 523245 (Oct. 3, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11569 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Soufer v. City of Waterbury, No. Cv97-0140344 (Apr. 30, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5444 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Town of Wallingford, No. Cv96-0386230 (Dec. 3, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 15715 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 1747; 1963, P.A. 490, S. 9; P.A. 96-171, S. 9, 16; P.A. 99-290, S. 1, 2; P.A. 00-230, S. 2; P.A. 02-103, S. 53; P.A. 06-83, S. 11; 06-196, S. 287; P.A. 07-127, S. 2; P.A. 11-61, S. 1; P.A. 22-118, S. 500; P.A. 23-204, S. 212; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 24-1, S. 3.) History: 1963 act made special provisions for farm, forest and open space land; P.A. 96-171 replaced “boards of tax review” with “boards of assessment appeals”, effective May 31, 1996; P.A. 99-290 added new Subsec. (b) re optional depreciation schedules for personal property and designated existing provisions as Subsec. (a), effective June 15, 1999; P.A. 00-230 made a technical correction in Subsec. (b)(10); P.A. 02-103 made a technical change in Subsec. (b)(3)(A); P.A. 06-83 added Subsec. (c) re depreciation rules for machinery and equipment, effective July 1, 2006; P.A. 06-196 made technical changes in Subsec. (c)(1), effective July 1, 2006; P.A. 07-127 added reference to maritime heritage land in Subsec. (a), effective July 1, 2007; P.A. 11-61 deleted former Subsec. (c) re depreciation rules for machinery and equipment, effective July 1, 2011; P.A. 22-118 amended Subsec. (b) by adding new Subdiv. (7) re schedule of depreciation applicable for assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2023, redesignating existing Subdivs. (7) to (11) as Subdivs. (8) to (12), adding “other than motor vehicles” in Subdiv. (8), adding “, other than a motor vehicle,” in Subdiv. (11), and made a conforming change, effective July 1, 2022; P.A. 23-204 amended Subsec. (b)(7) by substituting “October 1, 2024” for “October 1, 2023” re applicable assessment years, effective July 1, 2023, and applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2024; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 24-1 amended Subsec. (b) in Subdiv. (7) by changing “valued” to “assessed” and increasing the percentages of manufacturer's suggested retail prices by 5 per cent, in Subdiv. (8) by adding “other than a motor vehicle” re original selling price of leased personal property, in Subdiv. (10) by adding “motor vehicles,”, in Subdiv. (11) by adding “valued pursuant to subdivision (7) of this subsection”, by adding new Subdiv. (12) re assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2024, and redesignating existing Subdiv. (12) re taxpayer appeals as Subdiv. (13), and therein designating existing provision re appeals of assessments that do not accurately reflect present true and actual value as Subpara. (A) and adding Subpara. (B) re appeals of determinations of manufacturer's suggested retail price, effective July 1, 2024, and applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2024. Where assessors adopt rule of valuation conflicting with statute, remedy is by appeal to board of relief. 43 C. 309. If assessors adopt rule of valuation, assessment may be reduced on appeal to conform to such rule. 63 C. 18, 322. No distinction in law between assessed and actual value of real estate. 72 C. 372. Statute does not apply unless there is a market; if no market, then fair value must be otherwise ascertained. 99 C. 336. Cited. 102 C. 210; 105 C. 581. On capitalization of income, see 119 C. 5. Where market value not ascertainable, true and actual valuation must be determined by some other method. 122 C. 230. Property may be found to have market value in the absence of evidence of other sales of like property in open market. 125 C. 172. History of statute; valuation a question of fact for trier; not erroneous to consider reproduction cost and capitalization of income as well as actual sales prices in determining fair market value. 131 C. 575. Methods of determining “true and actual value”. 146 C. 578. Best test for determination of value is ordinarily that of market sales; land residual method discussed; value of real estate must be gauged by conditions prevailing over a period of time. Id., 669. Capitalization of net income method of valuation discussed. Id., 681. Cited. 149 C. 32. Fair market value can be determined from figure fixed by actual sales where there are sales, in ordinary course of business of other properties comparable in kind and location; where property was dam and not readily marketable, proper to resort to other means of ascertaining value as replacement cost minus depreciation. Id., 453. Although present value of all other property is fair market value, value of “farmland” is based on its current use without regard to neighborhood land use, even where plaintiffs had sold adjoining land at neighborhood values. 156 C. 107. Where plaintiffs failed to apply for classification of their farm as farmland under Sec. 12-107c, it was properly valued at its fair market value. Id., 437. Cited. 162 C. 87. Where golf course is classified as open space, it is valued on its current use and not at the highest value of farm land; in valuation of open space at current use, legislative intent is that current use value be less than what its fair market value might be; in determining “current use”, no particular formula is required. 174 C. 10. Cited. Id., 380; Id., 556. Fair market value is price that would probably result from fair negotiations between willing seller and willing buyer. 175 C. 301. Cited. 178 C. 100; Id., 295. Fair market value not determined where the one sale cited was not comparable, value realized from a forced or bid sale. Id., 606. Cited. 203 C. 425; 210 C. 233; 226 C. 407; 228 C. 23; 231 C. 731; 240 C. 192; Id., 422; 241 C. 382. Cited. 3 CA 53; 4 CA 106; 7 CA 496; 33 CA 270; 38 CA 158; 41 CA 249. Subsec. (b): A municipal tax assessor may utilize the depreciation schedule devised by the legislature in Subdiv. (6) even if the municipality has not adopted such schedule by ordinance pursuant to Subdiv. (2). 195 CA 831. Market value; methods for ascertaining. 1 CS 112. Valuation by owner placed in tax list not bar to reduction by court on appeal from board of relief. 6 CS 203. Cited. Id., 505. No other method legal for assessment if there is a market value. 8 CS 540. Cost of reproduction less depreciation proper if there is no market value. 11 CS 241. If most recent sales in same vicinity are of property held by bank, they are not a fair criterion for market value. 12 CS 47. Extensive discussion of various methods of valuation. 20 CS 476. Price index and inclusion of “factory burden” employed to determine assessment held improper. 25 CS 37.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 12-1
Definitions.§ 12-101
Due date and collection of tax.§ 12-102
Taxing of woodland.§ 12-103
Appeals.§ 12-107a
Declaration of policy.§ 12-107b
Definitions.§ 12-107c
Classification of land as farm land.§ 12-107f
Open space land.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 12-63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/12-63.