Connecticut Statutes
§ 12-62 — Revaluation of real property. Regulations. Treatment of certain Indian lands.
Connecticut § 12-62
This text of Connecticut § 12-62 (Revaluation of real property. Regulations. Treatment of certain Indian lands.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-62 (2026).
Text
(a)As used in this chapter:
(1)“Assessor” means the person responsible for establishing property assessments for purposes of a town's grand list and includes a board of assessors;
(2)“Field review” means the process by which an assessor, a member of an assessor's staff or person designated by an assessor examines each parcel of real property in its neighborhood setting, compares observable attributes to those listed on such parcel's corresponding property record, makes any necessary corrections based on such observation and verifies that such parcel's attributes are accounted for in the valuation being developed for a revaluation;
(3)“Full inspection” or “fully inspect” means to measure or verify the exterior dimensions of a building or structure and to enter and examine the interior o
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
New Haven Projects Ltd. Liability Co. v. City of New Haven
225 F.3d 283 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Waterbury Hotel Equity v. Waterbury Boaa, No. Cv97-0140410s (Nov. 5, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 15604 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
City of Danbury v. Philbury, Inc., No. Cv 94 0316860 (Jan. 28, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 197-F (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Msb Real Estate v. City of Bridgeport, No. Cv94 031 59 47 S (Feb. 5, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 1480 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
The Taunton Press v. Town of Newtown, No. Cv 97-328270-S (Aug. 20, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 11550 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Fgp Bridgeport, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review, No. Cv 93304759s (Oct. 3, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 6275 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Humiston v. Town of Southbury, No. Cv 96133244 (Jan. 16, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 283 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Soufer v. City of Waterbury, No. Cv97-0140344 (Apr. 30, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5444 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Fgp Bridgeport v. Board of Tax Review, No. Cv93 304759s (Oct. 2, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7740 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
101-115 South Main v. City, Waterbury, No. Cv94-0120628s (Mar. 26, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 3983 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 1737; 1949, 1951, S. 1046d; P.A. 74-253; P.A. 79-28, S. 1, 2; 79-485; P.A. 89-251, S. 190, 203; P.A. 91-296, S. 1, 5; P.A. 92-197, S. 1, 3; 92-221, S. 1, 3; P.A. 93-373; P.A. 95-283, S. 3, 68; P.A. 96-171, S. 5–7, 16; 96-218, S. 1, 5, 6; P.A. 97-68, S. 2, 3; 97-254, S. 1, 6; P.A. 98-242, S. 4, 9; P.A. 99-108, S. 1, 2; 99-189, S. 18, 20; P.A. 00-229, S. 3, 7; P.A. 02-49, S. 1, 2; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 04-2, S. 33; P.A. 06-148, S. 1; P.A. 07-246, S. 8; P.A. 09-196, S. 4; P.A. 13-291, S. 1; P.A. 22-74, S. 7.) History: P.A. 74-253 replaced obsolete reference to February 1, 1930, as date for commencement of 10-year revaluations with reference to October 1, 1978, and clarified that first required revaluation after that time be no later than 10 years after last preceding revaluation; P.A. 79-28 replaced “thereafter” with “after each such revaluation” for clarity; P.A. 79-485 added Subsec. (b) requiring that criteria etc. used in revaluation be available for public inspection; P.A. 89-251 added new Subsec. (b) providing that a revaluation of all real estate within 5 years of a revaluation conducted by physical observation, may be conducted by use of a statistical method of adjustment without viewing the real estate, Subsec. (d) providing that any municipality which has not revalued all real estate in the tenth year following the last preceding revaluation, or sooner, shall be required to revalue all real estate not later than October 1, 1991, Subsec. (e) requiring filing of written notice of revaluation with the secretary of the office of policy and management not later than five business days following final action establishing a mill rate for the revalued grand list, and providing that any municipality failing to comply with this section shall forfeit 10% of total state grants-in-aid to such municipality for the fiscal year next following the assessment date on which the required revaluation was not implemented, with an additional provision allowing waiver of such forfeiture by the secretary of the office of policy and management under certain conditions and Subsec. (f) providing that any municipality which has implemented the program of property tax surcharges and credits under Sec. 12-62d shall revalue no later than 5 years following the last preceding revaluation and every 5 years thereafter, allowing revaluation by statistical adjustment in certain cases as provided in Subsec. (b) of this section; P.A. 91-296 provided that the revaluations required by this section would not be required until October 1, 1992, rather than October 1, 1991; P.A. 92-197 provided that the revaluations required by this section would not be required until October 1, 1993, rather than October 1, 1992; P.A. 92-221 added Subsec. (g) regarding designation of revaluation companies and amended Subsec. (c) to conform with its provisions, effective June 1, 1992, and applicable to assessment years of municipalities commencing on or after October 1, 1992; P.A. 93-373 amended Subsec. (b) authorizing municipalities under certain conditions to annually conduct a revaluation by use of a statistical method; P.A. 95-283 amended Subsec. (a) to provide that commencing October 1, 1996, real estate be revalued every 12 years, instead of 10 years, by physical inspection and by statistical method every 4 years following the physical revaluation, deleted portion of Subsec. (b) re 5 year physical revaluation, deleted Subsec. (f) re towns which implemented a program of property tax surcharges and credits, relettered remaining Subsecs., added new Subsec. (g) re notice of revaluation and right to appeal, and made technical changes effective July 6, 1995; P.A. 96-171 amended Subsec. (a) to authorize “designees” of assessors to perform statistical revaluations, amended Subsec. (c) to require criteria, guidelines, price schedules or statement of procedures to continue to be available for public inspection until the next revaluation becomes effective and replace “October 1, 1979” with “October 1, 1996”, and amended Subsec. (g) to replace “appeal such revaluation” with “appeal the valuation of his property” and require the notice to include information on the manner in which an appeal may be filed with the board of assessment appeals, effective May 31, 1996; P.A. 96-218 provided a schedule for when towns must begin implementing physical and statistical revaluation cycles, added provision allowing assessor to have fulfilled the physical observation requirement if this was done within 4 years of the next scheduled physical revaluation, deleted Subsec. (d) re 10-year cycle and relettered remaining Subsecs. and made conforming and technical changes, and enacted new provision re agreements by contiguous towns which was added editorially by the Revisor as Subsec. (g), effective June 4, 1996; P.A. 97-68 amended Subsec. (f) by adding provision establishing time for mailing of the notice, effective May 27, 1997, and applicable to assessment years commencing on and after October 1, 1997; P.A. 97-254 deleted existing Subsec. (a)(1) and (2) and inserted new provisions effective October 1, 1997, re revaluing of all real estate in accordance with new schedule in new Subsec. (b), deleted existing Subsec. (b), amended Subsec. (f) to add requirement re when written revaluation notices must be sent out and made technical changes, effective June 27, 1997; P.A. 98-242 added new Subsec. (h) to allow one-time election by a town to revalue earlier than the date required by section, effective July 1, 1998; P.A. 99-108, designated Subsec. (i) by the Revisors, prohibited requiring a municipality to revalue prior to year of next revaluation, effective June 3, 1999, and applicable to assessment years of municipalities commencing on or after October 1, 1997; P.A. 99-189 amended Subsec. (d) to add provisions re postponement of revaluation for extraordinary circumstances and procedure and agreement with the Office of Policy and Management for waiver and made technical changes, effective June 23, 1999, and applicable to assessment years of municipalities commencing on or after October 1, 1999; P.A. 00-229 added Subsec. (j) re revaluation of certain Indian land, effective June 1, 2000, and applicable to assessment years commencing on and after October 1, 1998; P.A. 02-49 amended Subsec. (h)(2) to provide that, starting October 1, 2002, a town performing its revaluation before the time established in Subsec. (b) shall effect its next subsequent revaluation on the assessment date that is 4 years after the applicable date provided in Subsec. (b) instead of performing such revaluation 4 years after its early revaluation date and added Subsec. (k) exempting a municipality from conducting its next scheduled revaluation based on statistical calculations with respect to level of assessment, coefficient of dispersion and price related differential re all properties and properties in specific classes, effective May 9, 2002; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 04-2 amended Subsec. (a) to provide for physical inspection every 10 years and amended Subsec. (b) to delete former schedule for revaluation and to provide for revaluation every 5 years, effective October 1, 2003, and applicable to assessment years commencing on or after that date; P.A. 06-148 entirely replaced existing section with new Subsecs. (a) to (h), inclusive, adding definitions, requiring revaluations every 5 years, providing inspection requirements, requiring certain public documents, requiring notice to the Office of Policy and Management of town revaluation, allowing use of revaluation company, specifying notice provisions, requiring regulations and exempting certain Indian tribe land from revaluation, effective June 6, 2006, and applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2006; P.A. 07-246 amended Subsec. (c) to provide that nothing in subsection shall be construed to permit publication or posting on the Internet of a plan or drawing of certain dwelling units; P.A. 09-196 amended Subsec. (c) by requiring assessor to document any changes in property valuation as determined by revaluation company, effective July 8, 2009; P.A. 13-291 amended Subsec. (h) to require revaluation of certain Indian lands, effective July 1, 2013, and applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2013; P.A. 22-74 amended Subsec. (a) by adding new Subdiv. (4) defining “planning region”, adding new Subdiv. (7) defining “revaluation zone”, redesignating existing Subdivs. (4) and (5) as Subdivs. (5) and (6), and redesignating existing Subdivs. (6) and (7) as Subdivs. (8) and (9), amended Subsec. (b)(1) by designating existing provisions re revaluation process as Subpara. (A) and providing sunset date of September 30, 2023, and adding Subpara. (B) re revaluation process commencing October 1, 2023, amended Subsec. (e) by replacing “property” with “parcel”, and added Subsec. (i) re filing of parcel data, effective July 1, 2022, and applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2023. Failure of at least two assessors to view property in revaluation in 1928 cannot invalidate a proper valuation in 1930. 115 C. 580. Extra compensation to assessors for making revaluation. 116 C. 10. Revaluation not required to be done of all properties in same year; assistance of service company in arriving at valuations does not invalidate if assessors actually made assessments; to invalidate entire grand list, error in method of valuation must produce substantial injustice to taxpayers as a whole. 122 C. 218. Cited. 146 C. 669, 681; 149 C. 452. The duty is mandatory and its performance can be compelled by mandamus; when question is one of public right and object is to procure enforcement of public duty, the relator need not show he has any legal or special interest in the result. 150 C. 439. Cited. 169 C. 663; 170 C. 477, 480; 179 C. 627. Writ of mandamus properly granted under statutes. Id., 712. Because remedy for changing market values is set forth in statute, the use of average ratio approach is not applicable to discrepancies in valuation arising during 10-year period between valuations. 182 C. 619. Cited. 184 C. 326; 195 C. 48; 203 C. 425; 204 C. 336; 210 C. 233; 213 C. 307; 224 C. 110; 226 C. 92; 228 C. 23; Id., 476; 231 C. 731; 232 C. 335; 241 C. 749. Section does not insulate boards of tax review from appeals from over valuation during the years between decennial revaluations. 242 C. 363. Cited. Id., 550. Neither change in a property's use nor decision by a taxpayer to go out of business creates sufficient basis for mandatory interim revaluation of property. 249 C. 63. Cited. 3 CA 393; 21 CA 275; 38 CA 158; 41 CA 421; judgment reversed, see 242 C. 530; 43 CA 169. Town assessor's duties under statute are mandatory, not discretionary, and failure to make and complete another revaluation by statutorily mandated revaluation date constitutes a disregard of statute's mandate. 85 CA 480. Assessors under section not required to reassess but rather to revalue for assessment; viewing and revaluing need not be done in the same year. 3 CS 448. Town meetings have no control over valuations or revaluations. 19 CS 218.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 12-1
Definitions.§ 12-101
Due date and collection of tax.§ 12-102
Taxing of woodland.§ 12-103
Appeals.§ 12-107a
Declaration of policy.§ 12-107b
Definitions.§ 12-107c
Classification of land as farm land.§ 12-107f
Open space land.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 12-62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/12-62.