Connecticut Statutes

§ 12-117 — Extension of time for completion of duties of assessors and board of assessment appeals.

Connecticut § 12-117
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 12Taxation
Ch. 203Property Tax Assessment

This text of Connecticut § 12-117 (Extension of time for completion of duties of assessors and board of assessment appeals.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-117 (2026).

Text

(a)The period prescribed by law for the completion of the duties of any assessor, board of assessors or board of assessment appeals may, for due cause shown, be extended by the chief executive officer of the town for a period not exceeding one month, and in the case of the board of assessment appeals in any town in the assessment year in which a revaluation, pursuant to section 12-62, is required to be effective, such period shall be extended by said chief executive officer for a period not exceeding two months. Not later than two weeks after granting an extension as provided under this subsection, the chief executive officer shall send notice of the extension to the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management by mail or electronic mail in a manner prescribed by the secretary.
(b)If

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Stamford v. Daddona, No. Cv92 0127293 S (Nov. 4, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11242-G (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
McColgan v. Town of Woodstock, No. Cv 97 0056641 S (Apr. 3, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 4727 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Parnoff v. City, Bridgeport Tax Assessor No. Cv97 034 28 57 S (Oct. 5, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 12796 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Nargi v. City of Waterbury, No. Cv96-0133015s (Feb. 5, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 1476 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)

Legislative History

(1951, S. 1071d; 1967, P.A. 711; P.A. 77-309; 77-614, S. 139, 610; P.A. 79-610, S. 3, 47; P.A. 88-337, S. 4, 5; P.A. 95-283, S. 55, 68; P.A. 96-1, S. 2, 5; 96-171, S. 12, 16; P.A. 97-280, S. 5, 8; P.A. 98-242, S. 1, 9; P.A. 00-120, S. 9, 13; P.A. 01-195, S. 121, 181; P.A. 03-269, S. 4; P.A. 06-148, S. 3; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 21-2, S. 167.) History: 1967 act authorized use of prior list for assessments if appeals too numerous for equitable consideration except for transfers of ownership, additions for new construction and reductions for demolitions; P.A. 77-309 allowed two-month extension for board of tax review in year following revaluation; P.A. 77-614 substituted commissioner of revenue services for tax commissioner, effective January 1, 1979; P.A. 79-610 substituted secretary of the office of policy and management for commissioner of revenue services, effective July 1, 1980; P.A. 88-337 provided that a town need not revert to the list from which appeals were taken if, in the intervening time period, it has completed a revaluation; P.A. 95-283 divided section into Subsecs. (a) and (b), changed name of board of tax review to board of assessment appeals, added provision to Subsec. (a) re time period for appeal and transmission of abstract if extension is granted, and added new Subsec. (c) re notice provisions for increase of valuation and appeal requirements, effective July 6, 1995; P.A. 96-1 amended Subsec. (a) by allowing taxpayers a time extension for filing appeals if assessor's deadline has been extended, effective March 6, 1996, and applicable to assessment years of municipalities commencing on or after October 1, 1995; P.A. 96-171 amended Subsec. (c) to replace provision requiring the notice to be delivered within the time prescribed in Sec. 12-55 with provision requiring the notice to be sent not earlier than the date on which said Secretary grants his authorization and not later than the tenth day following the date on which the assessor completes the list and to add provision that if the increase notice is sent later than the prescribed time period the increase becomes effective on the next succeeding grand list, effective May 31, 1996; P.A. 97-280 added Subsec. (a)(2) re extension if town fails to adopt its budget within statutory time, limit effective June 27, 1997; P.A. 98-242 changed requirement that the Office of Policy and Management approve requests for extensions under Subsec. (a)(1) or (2) to approval by the chief executive officer of the municipality, with written notice to Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, effective June 8, 1998; P.A. 00-120 amended Subsec. (a) to replace reference to abstract of the assessment list with reference to report of the grand list, and amended Subsecs. (b) and (c) to specify references to grand list, effective May 26, 2000, and applicable to assessment years commencing October 1, 2000; P.A. 01-195 made technical changes for the purposes of gender neutrality in Subsec. (c), effective July 11, 2001; P.A. 03-269 amended Subsec. (a) to delete provisions re extension of date to submit request for appeal, notice of time and date of hearing, notice of decision not to hear appeal and extension of time for completion of duties of assessors or board of assessment appeals in town which fails to adopt budget in time prescribed, and made technical changes in Subsecs. (a) and (b), effective July 1, 2003; P.A. 06-148 amended Subsec. (a) to clarify when extension is available and require chief executive officer to grant such extension, and replaced former Subsecs. (b) and (c) with new Subsecs. (b) and (c) re postponement by Office of Policy and Management of implementation of revaluation and town actions upon grant of such postponement, effective June 6, 2006, and applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2006; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 21-2 amended Subsec. (a) by specifying that notice of extension shall be sent by mail or electronic mail, Subsec. (c) by specifying that increase notice shall be mailed or sent by electronic mail, and made conforming changes. The finding of due cause must be largely within the discretion of the trial judge and uncontrolled unless the circumstances show an abuse of discretion. 165 C. 546. Cited. 179 C. 712; 184 C. 326; 195 C. 48. Trial court did not improperly fail to consider doctrine of assemblage in determining number of usable acres and fair market value of plaintiff's property. 93 CA 120. Cited. 33 CS 175.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 12-117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/12-117.