Connecticut Statutes
§ 10-264q — Eligibility of certain magnet schools not in compliance with racial minority enrollment requirements to continue to receive operating grants.
Connecticut § 10-264q
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 10Education and Culture
Ch. 172Support of Public Schools. Transportation
This text of Connecticut § 10-264q (Eligibility of certain magnet schools not in compliance with racial minority enrollment requirements to continue to receive operating grants.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-264q (2026).
Text
Notwithstanding subdivision (3) of subsection (b) of section 10-264 l, an interdistrict magnet school program that (1) does not assist the state in meeting its obligations pursuant to the decision in Sheff v. O'Neill, 238 Conn. 1 (1996), or any related stipulation or order in effect, as determined by the Commissioner of Education, and (2) is not in compliance with the enrollment requirements for students of racial minorities, pursuant to section 10-264 l, following the submission of student information data of such interdistrict magnet school program to the state-wide public school information system, pursuant to section 10-10a, on or before October 1, 2019, shall remain eligible for an interdistrict magnet school operating grant pursuant to section 10-264 l for the fiscal years ending Jun
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
(June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5, S. 322; P.A. 19-139, S. 4; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 21-2, S. 413.) History: June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5 effective July 1, 2015; P.A. 19-139 replaced “2015” with “2019” and added “for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2020, and June 30, 2021” in Subdiv. (2), effective July 1, 2019; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 21-2 replaced “the goals of the 2008 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., as extended, or the goals of the 2013 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., as extended, as determined by the Commissioner of Education” with “its obligations pursuant to the decision in Sheff v. O'Neill, 238 Conn. 1 (1996), or any related stipulation or order in effect, as determined by the Commissioner of Education”, effective June 23, 2021.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 10-10i
Report on student data.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 10-264q, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/10-264q.