Connecticut Statutes

§ 10-264o — Tuition payable to interdistrict magnet schools that assist the state in meeting its obligations pursuant to Sheff v. O'Neill.

Connecticut § 10-264o
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 10Education and Culture
Ch. 172Support of Public Schools. Transportation

This text of Connecticut § 10-264o (Tuition payable to interdistrict magnet schools that assist the state in meeting its obligations pursuant to Sheff v. O'Neill.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-264o (2026).

Text

(a)Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter, interdistrict magnet schools that begin operations on or after July 1, 2008, pursuant to the decision in Sheff v. O'Neill, 238 Conn. 1 (1996), or any related stipulation or order in effect, as determined by the Commissioner of Education, may operate without district participation agreements and enroll students from any district through a lottery designated by the commissioner.
(b)For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, and each fiscal year thereafter, any tuition charged to a local or regional board of education by a regional educational service center or by Goodwin University Magnet Schools operating an interdistrict magnet school assisting the state in meeting its obligations pursuant to the decision in Sheff v. O'Neill, 238 Conn. 1 (

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

(P.A. 08-170, S. 14; Sept. Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-6, S. 24; P.A. 11-136, S. 13; Dec. Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-1, S. 13; P.A. 13-247, S. 125; P.A. 14-217, S. 94; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5, S. 314; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 21-2, S. 412; P.A. 23-204, S. 342; P.A. 24-29, S. 4; 24-78, S. 8; 24-81, S. 115.) History: P.A. 08-170 effective July 1, 2008; Sept. Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-6 deleted former Subsec. (b) and made a conforming change, deleted “but prior to July 1, 2009,” from provision re when interdistrict magnet schools begin operations, added language re lottery designated by commissioner to provision re enrollment of students from any district, made existing provision re tuition charged applicable to fiscal year 2009, and added provisions re tuition charged applicable to fiscal year 2010, fiscal year 2011 and each fiscal year thereafter, re sum of tuitions and re comprehensive review of operating budget by commissioner, effective October 5, 2009; P.A. 11-136 replaced “subsection (c) of this section” with “subsection (c) of section 10-264 l ” re calculation of per pupil state subsidy, effective July 8, 2011; Dec. Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-1 added “in a preschool program or in kindergarten to grade twelve, inclusive”, effective December 21, 2012; P.A. 13-247 deleted provisions re magnet school tuition charged for fiscal years ending June 30, 2009, and June 30, 2010, designated existing provisions as Subsecs. (a) and (b), amended Subsec. (b) by replacing “2011” with “2013”, deleting “in a preschool program or”, redesignating existing Subparas. (A) and (B) as Subdivs. (1) and (2), redesignating existing clauses (i) and (ii) as Subparas. (A) and (B) and making a conforming change, and added Subsec. (c) re preschool program tuition, effective July 1, 2013; P.A. 14-217 added “as extended, or the goals of the 2013 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al.” throughout and, in Subsecs. (b) and (c), replaced “that began operations on or after July 1, 2008, pursuant to” with “assisting the state in meeting the goals of”, effective July 1, 2014; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5 added “as extended” re 2013 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al. throughout and amended Subsec. (c) by deleting “and each fiscal year thereafter” in Subdiv. (3) and adding Subdiv. (4) re tuition charged to parent or guardian, effective July 1, 2015; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 21-2 replaced references to the 2008 and 2013 stipulations and orders for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., with references to obligations pursuant to decision in Sheff v. O'Neill, 238 Conn. 1 (1996), or any related stipulation or order in effect, made a conforming change in Subsec. (a), and added “,” after “10-264 l ” in Subsecs. (b), (c)(2) and (3), effective June 23, 2021; P.A. 23-204 amended Subsec. (b) by adding exception re tuition charged during fiscal year 2025 and each fiscal year thereafter shall not exceed 58 per cent of the per student tuition charged during fiscal year 2024, effective July 1, 2023; P.A. 24-29 made a technical change in Subsec. (b), effective May 21, 2024; P.A. 24-78 amended Subsecs. (b) and (c)(4) by adding references to Goodwin University Magnet Schools, effective May 30, 2024; P.A. 24-81 amended Subsec. (c) by deleting former Subdivs. (1) to (3) and redesignating Subdiv. (4) as Subsec. (c) and amended same by replacing “up to four thousand fifty-three dollars” with “not to exceed fifty-eight per cent the per child tuition charged during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024”, and added Subsec. (d) re tuition charged during fiscal year 2025 and each fiscal year thereafter shall not exceed 58 per cent the per student tuition charged during fiscal year 2024, effective July 1, 2024.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 10-264o, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/10-264o.