(a)
(1)Every taxpayer is entitled to be reimbursed for any reasonable fees and expenses related to an appeal before the State Board of Equalization if all of the following conditions are met:
(A)The taxpayer files a claim for the fee and expenses with the State Board of Equalization.
(B)The State Board of Equalization, in its sole discretion, finds that the action taken by the Franchise
Tax Board staff was unreasonable.
(2)For purposes of this section:
(A)Fees and expenses related to an appeal before the State Board of Equalization do not include fees and expenses incurred in cases where an appeal has been filed, but resolved before the Franchise Tax Board’s written statement of its position has been submitted to the State Board of Equalization.
(B)Fees may be awarded in excess
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a)
(1)
Every taxpayer is entitled to be reimbursed for any reasonable fees and expenses related to an appeal before the State Board of Equalization if all of the following conditions are met:
(A)
The taxpayer files a claim for the fee and expenses with the State Board of Equalization.
(B)
The State Board of Equalization, in its sole discretion, finds that the action taken by the Franchise
Tax Board staff was unreasonable.
(2)
For purposes of this section:
(A)
Fees and expenses related to an appeal before the State Board of Equalization do not include fees and expenses incurred in cases where an appeal has been filed, but resolved before the Franchise Tax Board’s written statement of its position has been submitted to the State Board of Equalization.
(B)
Fees may be awarded in excess of the fees paid or incurred if the fees are less than the reasonable fees because an individual representing the taxpayer is entitled to be reimbursed for no fee or for a fee which, taking into account all the facts and circumstances, is no more than a nominal fee. This subparagraph shall apply only if the award is paid to the individual or the individual’s employer.
(b)
(1)
To determine whether the Franchise Tax Board staff has been unreasonable, the State Board of Equalization shall consider whether the Franchise Tax Board has established that its position in the appeal was substantially justified.
(2)
For purposes of paragraph (1), the position of the Franchise Tax Board shall be presumed not to be substantially justified if its staff did not follow its applicable published guidance in the appeal. This presumption may be rebutted.
(3)
For purposes of paragraph (2), the term “applicable published guidance” means either of the following:
(A)
A regulation, legal ruling, notice, information release, or announcement.
(B)
Any chief counsel ruling or determination letter issued to a
taxpayer.
(c)
The amount of reimbursed fees and expenses shall be determined by the State Board of Equalization and shall be limited to the following:
(1)
Fees and expenses incurred after the date of a notice of proposed deficiency assessment or jeopardy assessment, or a denial of a claim for refund.
(2)
If the State Board of Equalization finds that the Franchise Tax Board staff was unreasonable with respect to certain issues but reasonable with respect to other issues, the amount of reimbursed fees and expenses shall be limited to those which relate to the issues where the Franchise Tax Board staff was unreasonable.
(d)
Any proposed determination by the State Board of Equalization pursuant to this section shall be available as a public record for at
least 10 days prior to the effective date of that determination.
(e)
The amendments made by the act amending this subdivision are effective for fees and expenses incurred more than 180 days after the effective date of the act amending this subdivision.