(a)Community corrections programs funded pursuant to this chapter shall identify and track specific outcome-based measures consistent with the goals of this act.
(b)The Judicial Council, in consultation with the Chief Probation Officers of California, shall specify and define minimum required outcome-based measures, which shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(1)The percentage and number of persons subject to local supervision who are being supervised in accordance with evidence-based practices.
(2)The
percentage and amount of state moneys expended for programs and practices that are evidence based, by program and practice, and a descriptive list of all programs and practices that are evidence based.
(3)Specification of supervision policies, procedures, pro
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a)
Community corrections programs funded pursuant to this chapter shall identify and track specific outcome-based measures consistent with the goals of this act.
(b)
The Judicial Council, in consultation with the Chief Probation Officers of California, shall specify and define minimum required outcome-based measures, which shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(1)
The percentage and number of persons subject to local supervision who are being supervised in accordance with evidence-based practices.
(2)
The
percentage and amount of state moneys expended for programs and practices that are evidence based, by program and practice, and a descriptive list of all programs and practices that are evidence based.
(3)
Specification of supervision policies, procedures, programs, and practices that were eliminated or added to increase the use of
evidence-based practices.
(4)
The percentage of persons subject to local supervision who successfully complete the period of supervision.
(5)
The total amount expended from the allocation by fiscal year.
(6)
To the extent that funds were not expended, the reason the funds were not spent on evidence-based practices, and a descriptive list of planned expenditures for these funds.
(c)
Each CPO receiving funding pursuant to Sections 1233 to 1233.6, inclusive, shall provide an annual written report to the Judicial Council, evaluating the effectiveness of the community corrections program, including, but not limited to, the data
described in subdivision (b).
Each submission will include a statement that affirms the accuracy of the CPO responses and intention to use funding pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 1230.
(d)
The Judicial Council, shall, in consultation with the CPO of each county and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, provide a quarterly statistical report to the Department of Finance including, but not limited to, the following statistical information for each county:
(1)
The number of felony filings.
(2)
The number of felony convictions.
(3)
The number of felony convictions in which the defendant was sentenced to the state prison.
(4)
The number of felony
convictions in which the defendant was granted probation.
(5)
The adult felon probation population.
(6)
The number of adult felony probationers who had their probation terminated and revoked and were sent to state prison for that revocation.
(7)
The number of adult felony probationers sent to state prison for a conviction of a new felony offense, including when probation was revoked or terminated.
(8)
The number of adult felony probationers who had their probation revoked and were sent to county jail for that revocation.
(9)
The number of adult felony probationers sent to county jail for a conviction of a new felony offense, including when probation was revoked or terminated.
(10)
The number of felons placed on postrelease community supervision, commencing January 1, 2012.
(11)
The number of felons placed on mandatory supervision, commencing January 1, 2012.
(12)
The mandatory supervision population, commencing January 1, 2012.
(13)
The postrelease community supervision population, commencing January 1, 2012.
(14)
The number of felons on postrelease community supervision sentenced to state prison for a conviction of a new felony offense, commencing January 1, 2012.
(15)
The number of felons on mandatory supervision sentenced to state prison for a conviction of a new felony offense, commencing January
1, 2012.
(16)
The number of felons who had their postrelease community supervision revoked and were sent to county jail for that revocation, commencing January 1, 2012. This number shall not include felons on postrelease community supervision who are subject to flash incarceration pursuant to Section 3453.
(17)
The number of felons on postrelease community supervision sentenced to county jail for a conviction of a new felony offense, including when postrelease community supervision was revoked or terminated, commencing January 1, 2012.
(18)
The number of felons who had their mandatory supervision revoked and were sentenced to county jail for that revocation, commencing January 1, 2012.
(19)
The number of felons on mandatory supervision sentenced to
county jail for a conviction of a new felony offense, including when mandatory supervision was revoked or terminated, commencing January 1, 2012.