California Statutes
§ 1089. — 1089. (Amended by Stats. 2003, Ch. 62, Sec. 230.)
California § 1089.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code PENPenal Code - PEN
Title7.
Part 2.TITLE 7. OF PROCEEDINGS AFTER THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE TRIAL AND BEFORE JUDGMENT
Ch. 1.CHAPTER 1. Challenging the Jury
This text of California § 1089. (1089. (Amended by Stats. 2003, Ch. 62, Sec. 230.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Penal Code - PEN Code § 1089. (2026).
Text
Whenever, in the opinion of a judge of a superior court about to try a defendant against whom has been filed any indictment or information or complaint, the trial is likely to be a protracted one, the court may cause an entry to that effect to be made in the minutes of the court, and thereupon, immediately after the jury is impaneled and sworn, the court may direct the calling of one or more additional jurors, in its discretion, to be known as “alternate jurors.”
The alternate jurors must be drawn from the same source, and in the same manner, and have the same qualifications as the jurors already sworn, and be subject to the same examination and challenges, provided that the prosecution and the defendant shall each be entitled to as many peremptory challenges to the alternate jurors as the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Joseph Corre Lamb, Jr.
529 F.2d 1153 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Daniel PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
119 F.3d 1422 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Williams v. Cavazos
646 F.3d 626 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Bell v. Uribe
748 F.3d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Konolus Smith v. Garry Swarthout
742 F.3d 885 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Hernandez v. McGrath
595 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (E.D. California, 2009)
Terry Bell v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
729 F.3d 1052 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Jessie Heredia v. Larry Small
534 F. App'x 606 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Grey v. Montgomery
(S.D. California, 2019)
Ochoa v. Clark
(N.D. California, 2023)
(HC) Schuster v. Espinoza
(E.D. California, 2019)
(HC) Becker v. Anglea
(E.D. California, 2020)
(DP) Weaver v. Chappell
(E.D. California, 2021)
(HC) Maine v. Martinez
(E.D. California, 2024)
Nevarez v. Godwin
(S.D. California, 2023)
Hector Lopez v. Scott Kernan
444 F. App'x 962 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Sammy E. Carlyle v. James Rowland, Director, Attorney General of the State of California
967 F.2d 584 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Joan Betts Diplarakos v. Susan Poole, Warden
974 F.2d 1341 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Moises Hernandez v. Gerald Janda
576 F. App'x 706 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Kyle Frank v. A.W. Lizarraga
(Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2003, Ch. 62, Sec. 230. Effective January 1, 2004.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 1089., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/PEN/1089..