California Statutes
§ 132a. — 132a. (Amended by Stats. 1990, Ch. 1550, Sec. 13.)
California·Code LAB Labor Code - LAB·Div. 1. DIVISION 1. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS·Ch. 5. CHAPTER 5. Division of Workers’ Compensation
It is the declared policy of this state that there should not be discrimination against workers who are injured in the course and scope of their employment.
(1)Any employer who discharges, or threatens to discharge, or in any manner discriminates against any employee because he or she has filed or made known his or her intention to file a claim for compensation with his or her employer or an application for adjudication, or because the employee has received a rating, award, or settlement, is guilty of a misdemeanor and the employee’s compensation shall be increased by one-half, but in no event more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), together with costs and expenses not in excess of two hundred fifty dollars ($250). Any such employee shall also be entitled to reinstatement and reimburse
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 132a. (132a. (Amended by Stats. 1990, Ch. 1550, Sec. 13.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jadwin v. County of Kern
767 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (E.D. California, 2011)
Martin Jimeno, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
66 F.3d 1514 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Prue v. Brady Company/San Diego, Inc. CA4/1
242 Cal. App. 4th 1367 (California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Hunt v. Check Recovery Systems, Inc.
478 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (N.D. California, 2007)
Wood v. County of Alameda
875 F. Supp. 659 (N.D. California, 1995)
Balzeit v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
569 F. Supp. 986 (N.D. California, 1983)
Hinton v. Pacific Enterprises
5 F.3d 391 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Gallo v. Board of Regents of the University of California
916 F. Supp. 1005 (S.D. California, 1995)
Camacho v. Target Corp.
234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 223 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
Buckley v. Gallo Sales Co.
949 F. Supp. 737 (N.D. California, 1996)
City of Anaheim v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
124 Cal. App. 3d 609 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
Taylor v. St. Regis Paper Company
560 F. Supp. 546 (C.D. California, 1983)
Crown Appliance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
9 Cal. Rptr. 3d 415 (California Court of Appeal, 2004)
Arnulfo Gradilla v. Ruskin Manufacturing, Business Entity Unknown
320 F.3d 951 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Shahram Keshe v. Cvs Pharmacy
711 F. App'x 396 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Katherine D. Coleman v. Computer Associates International, Inc.
139 F.3d 904 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Chung v. QBE Insurance Corporation
(S.D. California, 2024)
Mojan P. Shahsavar v. Bluemercury, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2023)
Christopher Peterson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
(C.D. California, 2023)
Camacho v. Target Corp.
(California Court of Appeal, 2018)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1990, Ch. 1550, Sec. 13.