(a)For the 1993–94, 1994–95, and 1995–96 fiscal years only, the amounts allocated pursuant to Sections 30052 and 30053 shall be available only for public safety services, and shall be allocated in each qualified county to local agencies as provided in subdivision (b).
(b)
(1)Each county shall create a Public Safety Augmentation Fund that shall consist of all revenues received by the county as a result of the allocations pursuant to Sections 30052 and
30053.
(2)Except as provided in paragraph (3) or (4), for each of the 1993–94, 1994–95, and 1995–96 fiscal years only, the augmentation fund described in paragraph (1) shall be allocated among the cities in the county that provide public safety services as follows:
(A)The auditor shall determine an allocation factor for each city withi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a)
For the 1993–94, 1994–95, and 1995–96 fiscal years only, the amounts allocated pursuant to Sections 30052 and 30053 shall be available only for public safety services, and shall be allocated in each qualified county to local agencies as provided in subdivision (b).
(b)
(1)
Each county shall create a Public Safety Augmentation Fund that shall consist of all revenues received by the county as a result of the allocations pursuant to Sections 30052 and
30053.
(2)
Except as provided in paragraph (3) or (4), for each of the 1993–94, 1994–95, and 1995–96 fiscal years only, the augmentation fund described in paragraph (1) shall be allocated among the cities in the county that provide public safety services as follows:
(A)
The auditor shall determine an allocation factor for each city within the county, the numerator of which shall be the amount of revenue shifted from that city to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund pursuant to Section 97.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year, less the amount of vehicle license fee revenues allocated to the city pursuant to Section 11005.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year, and the denominator of which shall be the amount of revenue shifted from all cities in the county and from the county to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund pursuant
to Section 97.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year, less the amount of vehicle license fee revenues allocated to the county and all cities in the county pursuant to Section 11005.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year.
(B)
The auditor shall multiply the amount in the augmentation fund by the allocation factor determined in subparagraph (A) for each city.
(C)
The allocation factor to be used for each city for the 1993–94 fiscal year may not result in an allocation that exceeds 50 percent of the difference between the following amounts:
(i)
The amount by which the city’s allocation of property tax revenues was reduced pursuant to Section 97.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year.
(ii)
The amount of vehicle license fee revenues allocated to the city pursuant to Section 11005.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year.
(D)
The allocation factor determined pursuant to this paragraph for the 1993–94 fiscal year shall also be applied in each fiscal year thereafter.
(3)
Notwithstanding paragraph (2), for each of the 1993–94, 1994–95, and 1995–96 fiscal years only, the amount in the augmentation fund established pursuant to paragraph (1) of each county described in subparagraph (C) shall be allocated to the cities in the county that provide public safety services as follows:
(A)
The auditor shall determine an allocation factor for each city within the county, the numerator of which shall be the amount of the revenue shifted from that city to the Educational Revenue
Augmentation Fund pursuant to Section 97.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year, and the denominator of which shall be the amount of revenue shifted from all cities in the county to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund pursuant to Section 97.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year.
(B)
The auditor shall multiply 5 percent of the amount in the augmentation fund established pursuant to paragraph (1) by the allocation factor determined for each city in subparagraph (A). The amount so computed for each city shall be allocated to that city.
(C)
This paragraph applies only to the Counties of Fresno, Kings, Merced, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Joaquin, Solano, and Yolo.
(D)
This paragraph shall apply to a particular county described in subparagraph (C) only if the total
amount allocated under this paragraph to all of the cities therein that provide public safety services is less than the amount that would otherwise be allocated to all of those cities pursuant to paragraph (2).
(4)
Notwithstanding paragraph (2), for each of the 1993–94, 1994–95, and 1995–96 fiscal years only, the amount in the augmentation fund established pursuant to paragraph (1) for the County of Alameda shall be allocated to the cities in the County of Alameda that provide public safety services as follows:
(A)
The auditor shall determine an allocation factor for each city within the county, the numerator of which shall be the amount of the revenue shifted from that city to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund pursuant to Section 97.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year, and the denominator of which shall be the amount of revenue shifted from all
cities in the County of Alameda to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund pursuant to Section 97.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for the 1993–94 fiscal year.
(B)
The auditor shall multiply 6.1 percent of the amount in the augmentation fund established pursuant to paragraph (1) by the allocation factor determined for each city in subparagraph (A). The amount so computed for each city shall be allocated to that city.
(5)
All moneys in the Public Safety Augmentation Fund not allocated to any city within the county pursuant to paragraph (2), (3), or (4) shall be allocated to the county.