California Statutes
§ 2581. — 2581. (Added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 219, Sec. 111.7.)
California·Code FAM Family Code - FAM·Div. 7. DIVISION 7. DIVISION OF PROPERTY·Part 3. PART 3. PRESUMPTION CONCERNING PROPERTY HELD IN JOINT FORM
For the purpose of division of property on dissolution of marriage or legal separation of the parties, property acquired by the parties during marriage in joint form, including property held in tenancy in common, joint tenancy, or tenancy by the entirety, or as community property, is presumed to be community property. This presumption is a presumption affecting the burden of proof and may be rebutted by either of the following:
(a)A clear statement in the deed or other documentary evidence of title by which the property is acquired that the property is separate property and not community property.
(b)Proof that the parties have made a written agreement that the property is separate property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 2581. (2581. (Added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 219, Sec. 111.7.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dumas v. Mantle (In re Mantle)
153 F.3d 1082 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Boyce
38 F. Supp. 3d 1135 (C.D. California, 2014)
Clifford Brace, Jr. v. Steven Speier
908 F.3d 531 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
In Re Marriage of Carpenter
122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 526 (California Court of Appeal, 2002)
Collins v. Wolf
591 B.R. 752 (S.D. California, 2018)
Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,803, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6982, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9650, 2 Cal. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 28 in Re John R. Mantle, Debtor. James A. Dumas, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee v. Dorothy M. Mantle
153 F.3d 1082 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
In re Brace
(California Supreme Court, 2020)
Legislative History
Added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 219, Sec. 111.7. Effective January 1, 1994.