California Statutes
§ 915. — 915. (Amended by Stats. 2004, Ch. 182, Sec. 29.)
California·Code EVID Evidence Code - EVID·Div. 8. DIVISION 8. PRIVILEGES·Ch. 3. CHAPTER 3. General Provisions Relating to Privileges
(a)Subject to subdivision (b), the presiding officer may not require disclosure of information claimed to be privileged under this division or attorney work product under subdivision (a) of Section 2018.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure in order to rule on the claim of privilege; provided, however, that in any hearing conducted pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 1524 of the Penal Code in which a claim of privilege is made and the court determines that there is no other feasible means to rule on the validity of the claim other than to require disclosure, the court shall proceed in accordance with subdivision (b).
(b)When a court is ruling on a claim of privilege under Article 9 (commencing with Section 1040) of Chapter 4 (official information and identity of informer) or under Sectio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 915. (915. (Amended by Stats. 2004, Ch. 182, Sec. 29.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Valverde
183 Cal. App. 4th 1531 (California Court of Appeal, 2010)
McAdam v. State National Insurance
15 F. Supp. 3d 1009 (S.D. California, 2014)
California Earthquake Authority v. Metropolitan West Securities, LLC
285 F.R.D. 585 (E.D. California, 2012)
Ludlow v. Flowers Foods, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2019)
Goro v. Flowers Foods, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2019)
Peterson v. Thomson International, Incorporated
(E.D. California, 2024)
Hovsepyan v. Geico General Ins. Co.
(E.D. California, 2020)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2004, Ch. 182, Sec. 29. Effective January 1, 2005. Operative July 1, 2005, by Sec. 64 of Ch. 182.