California Statutes
§ 1101. — 1101. (Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 261, Sec. 1.)
California § 1101.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code EVIDEvidence Code - EVID
Div. 9.DIVISION 9. EVIDENCE AFFECTED OR EXCLUDED BY EXTRINSIC POLICIES
Ch. 1.CHAPTER 1. Evidence of Character, Habit, or Custom
This text of California § 1101. (1101. (Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 261, Sec. 1.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Evidence Code - EVID Code § 1101. (2026).
Text
(a)Except as provided in this section and in Sections 1102, 1103, 1108, and 1109, evidence of a person’s character or a trait of his or her character (whether in the form of an opinion, evidence of reputation, or evidence of specific instances of his or her conduct) is inadmissible when offered to prove his or her conduct on a specified occasion.
(b)Nothing in this section prohibits the admission of evidence that a person committed a crime, civil wrong, or other act when relevant to prove some fact (such as motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake or accident, or whether a defendant in a prosecution for an unlawful sexual act or attempted unlawful sexual act did not reasonably and in good faith believe that the victim consented) other than h
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Doe v. Busby
661 F.3d 1001 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Gonzalez v. Knowles
515 F.3d 1006 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Martin Kipp v. Ron Davis
971 F.3d 939 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Frank v. Superior Court
770 P.2d 1119 (California Supreme Court, 1989)
Hebner v. McGrath
543 F.3d 1133 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Larry David Davis v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin
333 F.3d 982 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Stokes Ray CROTTS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee, v. George SMITH, Warden, California Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellant
73 F.3d 861 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Robert Frederick Garceau v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison
275 F.3d 769 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Danny Gene Fritchie v. D. J. McCarthy Superintendent
664 F.2d 208 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Schroeder v. Tilton
493 F.3d 1083 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Hernandez v. Martel
824 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (C.D. California, 2011)
Blumberg v. Garcia
687 F. Supp. 2d 1074 (C.D. California, 2010)
BARCO v. Tilton
694 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (C.D. California, 2010)
Harris v. Garcia
734 F. Supp. 2d 973 (N.D. California, 2010)
George v. ALMAGER
674 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (S.D. California, 2009)
Smith v. Roe
232 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (C.D. California, 2002)
Anthony Martinez v. James Yates
585 F. App'x 460 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Groen v. Busby
886 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (C.D. California, 2012)
Lisker v. Knowles
651 F. Supp. 2d 1097 (C.D. California, 2009)
People v. Montano
(California Court of Appeal, 2022)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 261, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1997.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 1101., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/EVID/1101..