California Statutes
§ 9203. — 9203. (Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 210, Sec. 30.)
California § 9203.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code COMCommercial Code - COM
Div. 9.DIVISION 9. SECURED TRANSACTIONS
Ch. 2.CHAPTER 2. Effectiveness of Security Agreement: Attachment of Security Interest: Rights of Parties to Security Agreement
This text of California § 9203. (9203. (Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 210, Sec. 30.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Commercial Code - COM Code § 9203. (2026).
Text
(a)A security interest attaches to collateral when it becomes enforceable against the debtor with respect to the collateral, unless an agreement expressly postpones the time of attachment.
(b)Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (c) to (i), inclusive, a security interest is enforceable against the debtor and third parties with respect to the collateral only if each of the following conditions is satisfied:
(1)Value has been given.
(2)The debtor has rights in the collateral or the power to transfer rights in the
collateral to a secured party.
(3)One of the following conditions is met:
(A)The debtor has signed a security agreement that provides a description of the collateral and, if the security interest covers timber to be cut, a description of the land concerned.
(B)T
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.
113 F.3d 1091 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
In Re Kamps
217 B.R. 836 (C.D. California, 1998)
In the Matter of Nunnemaker Transportation Co., Inc., William P. Grover, Trustee v. United California Bank
456 F.2d 28 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
Bank of the West v. Commercial Credit Financial Services, Inc.
852 F.2d 1162 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Weststeyn Dairy 2 v. Eades Commodities Co.
280 F. Supp. 2d 1044 (E.D. California, 2003)
In Re Carlos
215 B.R. 52 (C.D. California, 1997)
In Re Boogie Enterprises, Inc., Dba: Action Headwear Fka: Plainview Headwear, Debtor. David A. Gill, Chapter 7 Trustee v. United States
866 F.2d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Foothill Capital Corp. v. Clare's Food Market, Inc.
113 F.3d 1091 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Robert Bogetti & Sons v. Bank of America NT & SA (In Re Robert Bogetti & Sons)
162 B.R. 289 (E.D. California, 1993)
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc. v. Franchise Pictures LLC (In Re Franchise Pictures LLC)
389 B.R. 131 (C.D. California, 2008)
Textron Financial Corp. v. Rebel Rents, Inc. (In Re Rebel Rents, Inc.)
307 B.R. 171 (C.D. California, 2004)
Qmect, Inc. v. Burlingame Capital Partners II, L.P.
373 B.R. 682 (N.D. California, 2007)
Cecil v. ROCKY MOUTAIN RAILWAY AND MINING MUSEUM
543 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (E.D. California, 2008)
Brandt v. Fleet Capital Corp. (In Re TMCI Electronics)
279 B.R. 552 (N.D. California, 1999)
Mlq Investors, L.P. v. Pacific Quadracasting, Inc.
146 F.3d 746 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Esr Investments, Ltd. v. David A. Fontana Thelma L. Fontana Jack E. Fontana Mary A. Fontana Richard Rockwell David S. Thomas Rockwell & Rogers Chicago Title Insurance Company
996 F.2d 1224 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
21st Mortgage Corporation v. Hayes
(N.D. California, 2024)
Christofferson v. All Pure Pool Service of Central California, Inc
(E.D. California, 2020)
21st Mortgage Corporation v. Hayes
(Ninth Circuit, 2025)
United States v. Nextgear Capital, Inc.
677 F. App'x 366 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 210, Sec. 30. (SB 95) Effective January 1, 2024.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 9203., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/COM/9203..