California Statutes
§ 2316. — 2316. (Enacted by Stats. 1963, Ch. 819.)
California § 2316.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code COMCommercial Code - COM
Div. 2.DIVISION 2. SALES
Ch. 3.CHAPTER 3. General Obligation and Construction of Contract
This text of California § 2316. (2316. (Enacted by Stats. 1963, Ch. 819.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Commercial Code - COM Code § 2316. (2026).
Text
(1)Words or conduct relevant to the creation of an express warranty and words or conduct tending to negate or limit warranty shall be construed wherever reasonable as consistent with each other; but subject to the provisions of this division on parol or extrinsic evidence (Section 2202) negation or limitation is inoperative to the extent that such construction is unreasonable.
(2)Subject to subdivision (3), to exclude or modify the implied warranty of merchantability or any part of it the language must mention merchantability and in case of a writing must be conspicuous, and to exclude or modify any implied warranty of fitness the exclusion must be by a writing and conspicuous. Language to exclude all implied warranties of fitness is sufficient if it states, for example, that “There are
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.
293 F. Supp. 3d 888 (N.D. California, 2018)
Frenzel v. Aliphcom
76 F. Supp. 3d 999 (N.D. California, 2014)
In Re Sony Grand Wega KDF-E A10/A20 Series Rear Projection HDTV Television Litigation
758 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (S.D. California, 2010)
In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.
291 F. Supp. 3d 936 (N.D. California, 2018)
Minkler v. Apple, Inc.
65 F. Supp. 3d 810 (N.D. California, 2014)
Ventura v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc.
551 F. App'x 916 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
771 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (N.D. California, 2010)
Backus v. General Mills, Inc.
122 F. Supp. 3d 909 (N.D. California, 2015)
Best v. Harris Moran Seed Co.
44 F. Supp. 3d 974 (S.D. California, 2014)
Simpson v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.
989 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (S.D. California, 2013)
ANTHONY VENTURA v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA
(Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Lance Baird v. Samsung Electronics America
(Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Smith v. Apple, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2023)
Crown Cell Inc. v. Ecovacs Robotics, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2022)
Turner v. Sony Corporation of America
(N.D. California, 2021)
Marlene Cruz Flores v. Ford Motor Company
(C.D. California, 2025)
Joanna Park-Kim v. Daikin Applied Americas, Inc.
(Ninth Circuit, 2019)
Henrietta Mine LLC v. A.M. King Industries Incorporated
(E.D. California, 2021)
Brar v. Microsoft Corporation
(E.D. California, 2025)
Magic Link Garment Ltd. v. ThirdLove, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2020)
Legislative History
Enacted by Stats. 1963, Ch. 819.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 2316., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/COM/2316..