California Statutes
§ 11207. — 11207. (Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 210, Sec. 85.)
California·Code COM Commercial Code - COM·Div. 11. DIVISION 11. FUNDS TRANSFERS·Ch. 2. CHAPTER 2. Issue and Acceptance of Payment Order
(a)Subject to subdivision (b), if, in a payment order received by the beneficiary’s bank, the name, bank account number, or other identification of the beneficiary refers to a nonexistent or unidentifiable person or account, no person has rights as a beneficiary of the order and acceptance of the order cannot occur.
(b)If a payment order received by the beneficiary’s bank identifies the beneficiary both by name and by an identifying or bank account number and the name and number identify different persons, the following rules apply:
(1)Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (c), if the
beneficiary’s bank does not know that the name and number refer to different persons, it may rely on the number as the proper identification of the beneficiary of the order. The beneficiary’s b
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 11207. (11207. (Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 210, Sec. 85.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grand Bayman Belize, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo and Company
(C.D. California, 2021)
Ozer Holdings, LLC v. Citibank, National Association
(E.D. California, 2025)
Attisha Enterprises Inc. v. Capital One Bank
(S.D. California, 2020)
Ozer Holdings, LLC and Joint Properties, LP v. Citibank, N.A.
(E.D. California, 2025)
Meridian Growers Processing, Inc. v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
(E.D. California, 2024)
BPi Bright Power, Inc. v. Umpqua Holding Corporation d/b/a Umpqua Bank
(N.D. California, 2023)
Grand Bayman Belize, Ltd v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(Ninth Circuit, 2022)
S&S Worldwide, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(N.D. California, 2020)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 210, Sec. 85. (SB 95) Effective January 1, 2024.