California Statutes
§ 48a. — 48a. (Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 86, Sec. 17.)
(a)In any action for damages for the publication of a libel in a daily or weekly news publication, or of a slander by radio broadcast, plaintiff shall only recover special damages unless a correction is demanded and is not published or broadcast, as provided in this section. Plaintiff shall serve upon the publisher at the place of publication, or broadcaster at the place of broadcast, a written notice specifying the statements claimed to be libelous and demanding
that those statements be corrected. The notice and demand must be served within 20 days after knowledge of the publication or broadcast of the statements claimed to be libelous.
(b)If a correction is demanded within 20 days and is not published or broadcast in substantially as conspicuous a manner in the same daily or weekly
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 48a. (48a. (Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 86, Sec. 17.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donald Newcombe v. Adolf Coors Company Foote, Cone and Belding and Time, Inc.
157 F.3d 686 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Downing v. Abercrombie & Fitch
265 F.3d 994 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Joseph L. Alioto v. Cowles Communications, Inc.
519 F.2d 777 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.
28 F. Supp. 2d 1120 (C.D. California, 1998)
Allen v. City of Los Angeles
92 F.3d 842 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Trans World Accounts, Inc. v. Associated Press
425 F. Supp. 814 (N.D. California, 1977)
Tom Hanley v. The Tribune Publishing Company, D/B/A the Oakland Tribune
527 F.2d 68 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Hoesl v. United States
451 F. Supp. 1170 (N.D. California, 1978)
Goldman v. Time, Inc.
336 F. Supp. 133 (N.D. California, 1971)
Robinson v. HSBC BANK USA
732 F. Supp. 2d 976 (N.D. California, 2010)
Song Fi Inc. v. Google, Inc.
108 F. Supp. 3d 876 (N.D. California, 2015)
Condit v. National Enquirer, Inc.
248 F. Supp. 2d 945 (E.D. California, 2002)
Church of Scientology of Cal. v. Dell Publishing Co., Inc.
362 F. Supp. 767 (N.D. California, 1973)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5862, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9569 Byrant Allen Freddie G. Helms Rodney Glenn King v. City of Los Angeles v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Byrant Allen Freddie G. Helms Rodney Glenn King v. City of Los Angeles v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Claimant-Appellant
92 F.3d 842 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Sheppard v. Cable News Network, Inc.
106 F. Supp. 2d 1000 (N.D. California, 2000)
Harkonen v. Fleming
880 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (N.D. California, 2012)
Richard P. Crane, Jr. And James D. Henderson, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. The Arizona Republic, Jerry Seper, and Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
108 F.3d 337 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
George Downing v. Abercrombie & Fitch
265 F.3d 994 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Vu Nguy v. Lapson Luu
(C.D. California, 2023)
Shahid Buttar for Congress Committee v. Hearst Communications, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2022)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 86, Sec. 17. (SB 1171) Effective January 1, 2017.