California Statutes
§ 2778. — 2778. (Enacted 1872.)
California § 2778.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code CIVCivil Code - CIV
Div. 3.DIVISION 3. OBLIGATIONS
Title12.
Part 4.TITLE 12. INDEMNITY
This text of California § 2778. (2778. (Enacted 1872.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Civil Code - CIV Code § 2778. (2026).
Text
In the interpretation of a contract of indemnity, the following rules are to be applied, unless a contrary intention appears:
1.Upon an indemnity against liability, expressly, or in other equivalent terms, the person indemnified is entitled to recover upon becoming liable;
2.Upon an indemnity against claims, or demands, or damages, or costs, expressly, or in other equivalent terms, the person indemnified is not entitled to recover without payment thereof;
3.An indemnity against claims, or
demands, or liability, expressly, or in other equivalent terms, embraces the costs of defense against such claims, demands, or liability incurred in good faith, and in the exercise of a reasonable discretion;
4.The person indemnifying is bound, on request of the person indemnified, to defend actions
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa Monica
450 F.3d 1022 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance
695 F. Supp. 469 (C.D. California, 1987)
Sentex Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
882 F. Supp. 930 (C.D. California, 1995)
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Joseph C. Schwab
739 F.2d 431 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BOBAC TRUCKING INC., Defendant-Appellant
107 F.3d 733 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Zurich Insurance Co. v. Killer Music, Inc.
998 F.2d 674 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Save Mart Supermarkets v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
843 F. Supp. 597 (N.D. California, 1994)
USF Insurance v. Clarendon America Insurance
452 F. Supp. 2d 972 (C.D. California, 2006)
Taco Bell Corp. v. TBWA Chiat/Day Inc.
552 F.3d 1137 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Cathay Mortuary (Wah Sang) Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance
582 F. Supp. 650 (N.D. California, 1984)
H-10 Water Taxi Company, Ltd. v. United States
379 F.2d 963 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
Okada v. MGIC Indemnity Corp.
795 F.2d 1450 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Taburaza v. Zarate (In re Zarate)
567 B.R. 176 (N.D. California, 2017)
Lincoln General Insurance v. Access Claims Administrators, Inc.
596 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (E.D. California, 2009)
Scie LLC v. Xl Reinsurance America, Inc.
397 F. App'x 348 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Dewitt v. Western Pacific Railroad
719 F.2d 1448 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
City of Watsonville v. Corrigan
58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 458 (California Court of Appeal, 2007)
Zurich Insurance v. Killer Music, Inc.
998 F.2d 674 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Christopher Hamilton v. Elite of Los Angeles, Inc.
(Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Estate of Betty Goldberg v. Goss-Jewett Co.
(Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Legislative History
Enacted 1872.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 2778., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/CIV/2778..