California Statutes
§ 1213. — 1213. (Amended by Stats. 1989, Ch. 698, Sec. 1.)
California·Code CIV Civil Code - CIV·Div. 2. DIVISION 2. PROPERTY·Title 4.·Part 4. TITLE 4. TRANSFER·Ch. 4. CHAPTER 4. Recording Transfers·Art. 4. ARTICLE 4. Effect of Recording, or the Want Thereof
Every conveyance of real property or an estate for years therein acknowledged or proved and certified and recorded as prescribed by law from the time it is filed with the recorder for record is constructive notice of the contents thereof to subsequent purchasers and mortgagees; and a certified copy of such a recorded conveyance may be recorded in any other county and when so recorded the record thereof shall have the same force and effect as though it was of the original conveyance and where the original conveyance has been recorded in any county wherein the property therein mentioned is not situated a certified copy of the recorded conveyance may be
recorded in the county where such property is situated with the same force and effect as if the original conveyance had been recorded in th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 1213. (1213. (Amended by Stats. 1989, Ch. 698, Sec. 1.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Eli Kenneth Mellor and Lisa Mellor, Debtors. Raymond G. Pistole and Raymond R. Bragg v. Eli Kenneth Mellor and Lisa Mellor
734 F.2d 1396 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
William E. Schrambling Accountancy Corporation v. United States of America, Harold E. Allen v. United States
937 F.2d 1485 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Great Western Bank v. Snow (In Re Snow)
201 B.R. 968 (C.D. California, 1996)
Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. v. Taxel (In Re Deuel)
594 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Perry v. O'Donnell
749 F.2d 1346 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
Znider v. United States (In Re Znider)
150 B.R. 239 (C.D. California, 1993)
In Re Planned Protective Services, Inc.
130 B.R. 94 (C.D. California, 1991)
In Re Bush
356 B.R. 28 (S.D. California, 2006)
Cesar v. Charter Adjustments Corp.
519 B.R. 792 (E.D. California, 2014)
Brooks-Hamilton v. City of Oakland (In Re Brooks-Hamilton)
348 B.R. 512 (N.D. California, 2006)
Kipperman v. Sutherland
356 B.R. 28 (S.D. California, 2006)
Grover v. Gulino
779 F.2d 546 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Ortiz-Luis v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(S.D. California, 2021)
IN RE: 1563 28th Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94122
(N.D. California, 2020)
Hannonen v. McCloskey
(S.D. California, 2025)
Yolanda Ford
(C.D. California, 2022)
Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. v. Taxel
594 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
First Federal Bank v. Chevy Chase Bank
342 F. App'x 303 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1989, Ch. 698, Sec. 1.