California Statutes
§ 474. — 474. (Amended by Stats. 1955, Ch. 886.)
California § 474.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code CCPCode of Civil Procedure - CCP
Title6.
Part 2.TITLE 6. OF THE PLEADINGS IN CIVIL ACTIONS
Ch. 8.CHAPTER 8. Variance—Mistakes in Pleadings and Amendments
This text of California § 474. (474. (Amended by Stats. 1955, Ch. 886.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Code of Civil Procedure - CCP Code § 474. (2026).
Text
When the plaintiff is ignorant of the name of a defendant, he must state that fact in the complaint, or the affidavit if the action is commenced by affidavit, and such defendant may be designated in any pleading or proceeding by any name, and when his true name is discovered, the pleading or proceeding must be amended accordingly; provided, that no default or default judgment shall be entered against a defendant so designated, unless it appears that the copy of the summons or other process, or, if there be no summons or process, the copy of the first pleading or notice served upon such defendant bore on the face thereof a notice stating in substance: “To the person served: You
are hereby served in the within action (or proceedings) as (or on behalf of) the person sued under the fictiti
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of La
766 F.3d 1191 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Gardiner Family, LLC v. Crimson Resource Management Corp.
147 F. Supp. 3d 1029 (E.D. California, 2015)
Rumberg v. Weber Aircraft Corp.
424 F. Supp. 294 (C.D. California, 1976)
Rodgers v. Horsely
123 F. App'x 281 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Scott v. Garcia
370 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (S.D. California, 2005)
Monzon v. County of San Diego
(S.D. California, 2023)
Valdez v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
(S.D. California, 2021)
PG&E Corporation
(N.D. California, 2023)
Deleon v. City of San Diego
(S.D. California, 2024)
(PC) Eiland v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Facility
(E.D. California, 2020)
Joseph v. Stryker Corp.
(E.D. California, 2022)
Ward v. The County of Mendocino
(N.D. California, 2019)
San Diego Branch of National Association For The Advancement of Colored People
(S.D. California, 2019)
Moriarty v. County of San Diego
(S.D. California, 2019)
Steinmeir v. County of San Diego
(S.D. California, 2020)
Castillo v. Castillo
(S.D. California, 2025)
Eloy Mascorro v. The City of San Diego, et al.
(S.D. California, 2025)
Olympic Club v. Those Interested Underwriters At Lloyd's London
991 F.2d 497 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Oseguera v. Winters
21 F. App'x 636 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Woodard v. Cedars Sinai Hospital
(Ninth Circuit, 2025)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1955, Ch. 886.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 474., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/CCP/474..