California Statutes
§ 3343. — 3343. (Amended by Stats. 1971, Ch. 943.)
California·Code CIV Civil Code - CIV·Div. 4. DIVISION 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS·Title 2.·Part 1. TITLE 2. COMPENSATORY RELIEF·Ch. 2. CHAPTER 2. Measure of Damages [[3300.] - 3361.]·Art. 2. ARTICLE 2. Damages for Wrongs
(a)One defrauded in the purchase, sale or exchange of property is entitled to recover the difference between the actual value of that with which the defrauded person parted and the actual value of that which he received, together with any additional damage arising from the particular transaction, including any of the following:
(1)Amounts actually and reasonably expended in reliance upon the fraud.
(2)An amount which would compensate the defrauded party for loss of use and enjoyment of the property to the extent that
any such loss was proximately caused by the fraud.
(3)Where the defrauded party has been induced by reason of the fraud to sell or otherwise part with the property in question, an amount which will compensate him for profits or other gains which might reasonably have bee
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 3343. (3343. (Amended by Stats. 1971, Ch. 943.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adriana International Corp. v. Thoeren
913 F.2d 1406 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Stout v. Turney
586 P.2d 1228 (California Supreme Court, 1978)
Consolidated Data Terminals, a California Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-Appellee
708 F.2d 385 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
216 Cal. App. 3d 388 (California Court of Appeal, 1989)
In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
754 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (C.D. California, 2010)
In re Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig.
313 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (N.D. California, 2018)
William S. Lund v. Donald H. Albrecht
936 F.2d 459 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Channell v. Anthony
58 Cal. App. 3d 290 (California Court of Appeal, 1976)
Allstate Insurance v. Miller
743 F. Supp. 723 (N.D. California, 1990)
Delarosa v. Boiron, Inc.
275 F.R.D. 582 (C.D. California, 2011)
Michelson v. Camp
72 Cal. App. 4th 955 (California Court of Appeal, 1999)
Ambassador Hotel Co. v. Wei-Chuan Investment
189 F.3d 1017 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Klause v. Thompson (In Re Klause)
181 B.R. 487 (C.D. California, 1995)
Cory v. Villa Properties
180 Cal. App. 3d 592 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
Kukulka-Stone v. Ekrem (In Re Ekrem)
192 B.R. 982 (C.D. California, 1996)
Daniel v. Del Valle (In re Del Valle)
577 B.R. 789 (C.D. California, 2017)
Low v. Altus Finance S.A.
136 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (C.D. California, 2001)
AIG Retirement Services, Inc. v. Altus Finance S.A.
365 F. App'x 756 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
First v. Allstate Insurance
222 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (C.D. California, 2002)
Peter Molina v. Ford Motor Company
(C.D. California, 2023)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1971, Ch. 943.