Arizona § 48-2335 Administrative powers of board

Arizona Statutes

§ 48-2335 — Administrative powers of board

Arizona § 48-2335

Title 48Arizona Revised Statutes

Ch. 17AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS

Art. 2Administration

This text of Arizona § 48-2335 (Administrative powers of board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 48-2335 (2026).

Text

The board may, for and in the name of the district:

1.Manage and conduct the business and affairs of the district.

2.Make and execute all necessary contracts.

3.Adopt a seal for the district to be used in the attestation of documents.

4.Provide for the payment from the appropriate funds of all debts and just claims against the district.

5.Employ and appoint, when necessary, engineers to survey, plan, locate and estimate the cost of the works necessary for irrigation, drainage or power, or any of them.

6.Establish and enforce by-laws, rules and regulations necessary to carry on any of the business of the district.

7.Perform all other acts and things necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The board may, for and in the name of the district:

1. Manage and conduct the business and affairs of the district.

2. Make and execute all necessary contracts.

3. Adopt a seal for the district to be used in the attestation of documents.

4. Provide for the payment from the appropriate funds of all debts and just claims against the district.

5. Employ and appoint, when necessary, engineers to survey, plan, locate and estimate the cost of the works necessary for irrigation, drainage or power, or any of them.

6. Establish and enforce by-laws, rules and regulations necessary to carry on any of the business of the district.

7. Perform all other acts and things necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2091, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2621, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3858 Nichet Smith and Renaldo Fowler v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Board of Directors, of Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District James L. Diller Howard W. Lydic Eldon Rudd Gilbert R. Rogers Clarence C. Pendergast, Jr. Fred J. Ash James R. Marshall Dwayne E. Dobson Bruce B. Brooks William W. Arnett Mark W. Pace Emil M. Rovey Sued in Their Official Capacity as Members of the Council of Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Roy W. Cheatham Clarence J. Duncan Lester Mowry Lawrence P. Schrader Mario J. Herrera Wayne A. Marietta Kevin J. Johnson Byron G. Williams John E. Anderson Lee Tregaskes John A. Vanderwey C. Dale Willis Orland R. Hatch Ben Butler Elvin E. Fleming Larry D. Rovey Charles D. Copperinger Robert L. Cook Lloyd Lee Banning David Rousseau Dan C. McKinney Jr. Wayne A. Hart Michael K. Gantzel Dale Riggins W. Curtis Dana Edmund Navarro Ann M. Burton Mario J. Herrera William P. Schrader Robert G. Kempton Wayne A. Weiler Sued in Their Official Capacity as Members of the Council of Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Members of the Board of Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District

109 F.3d 586 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

8 case citations

Smith v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District

109 F.3d 586 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

2 case citations