Arizona § 45-1223 Stay of director's decision; precedence of actions for judicial review

Arizona Statutes

§ 45-1223 — Stay of director's decision; precedence of actions for judicial review

Arizona § 45-1223

Title 45Arizona Revised Statutes

Ch. 6DAMS AND RESERVOIRS

Art. 1Supervision of Dams, Reservoirs and Projects

This text of Arizona § 45-1223 (Stay of director's decision; precedence of actions for judicial review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 45-1223 (2026).

Text

A.A decision of the director shall not be stayed pending an action for judicial review, except that the judge to whom the action for judicial review has been assigned may stay the decision of the director with or without bond on a showing of good cause. In determining if good cause exists under the circumstances, the court may consider whether:

1.The public interest will be adversely affected by a stay.

2.The stay will harm others.

3.There is a high probability that the appellant will succeed on the merits.

4.The appellant will suffer irreparable harm before a decision on the merits can be rendered.

B.For the benefit of the people of this state, actions for judicial review under this article have precedence, in every court, over all other civil proceedings.

C.The final decisi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. A decision of the director shall not be stayed pending an action for judicial review, except that the judge to whom the action for judicial review has been assigned may stay the decision of the director with or without bond on a showing of good cause. In determining if good cause exists under the circumstances, the court may consider whether:

1. The public interest will be adversely affected by a stay.

2. The stay will harm others.

3. There is a high probability that the appellant will succeed on the merits.

4. The appellant will suffer irreparable harm before a decision on the merits can be rendered.

B. For the benefit of the people of this state, actions for judicial review under this article have precedence, in every court, over all other civil proceedings.

C. The final decision of the superior court is appealable in the same manner as in civil actions generally and shall be governed by the rules of appellate procedure.