Arizona § 36-795.03 Enforcement; violations; classification

Arizona Statutes

§ 36-795.03 — Enforcement; violations; classification

Arizona § 36-795.03

Title 36Arizona Revised Statutes

Ch. 6PUBLIC HEALTH CONTROL

Art. 10Kratom Products

This text of Arizona § 36-795.03 (Enforcement; violations; classification) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 36-795.03 (2026).

Text

A.In addition to the violations and remedies specified in this section, violations and enforcement of this article are governed by chapter 8 of this title.

B.A processor or retailer that violates section 36-795.01, subsection B or section 36-795.02 is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.

C.In addition to and distinct from any other remedy at law or equity, a person aggrieved by a violation of section 36-795.01, subsection B or section 36-795.02, subsection A may bring a private cause of action in a court of competent jurisdiction for damages resulting from that violation, including economic, noneconomic or consequential damages.

D.A processor or retailer does not violate section 36-795.01, subsection B or section 36-795.02, subsection A if the court finds by a preponderance of the evide

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. In addition to the violations and remedies specified in this section, violations and enforcement of this article are governed by chapter 8 of this title.

B. A processor or retailer that violates section 36-795.01, subsection B or section 36-795.02 is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.

C. In addition to and distinct from any other remedy at law or equity, a person aggrieved by a violation of section 36-795.01, subsection B or section 36-795.02, subsection A may bring a private cause of action in a court of competent jurisdiction for damages resulting from that violation, including economic, noneconomic or consequential damages.

D. A processor or retailer does not violate section 36-795.01, subsection B or section 36-795.02, subsection A if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the processor or retailer relied in good faith on the representation of a manufacturer, packer or distributor that the food was a kratom product.